Inside Track: Justice Hagedorn Opines that There Are No Procedural Bars to Disclosure Under Public Records Laws:

Sign In

State Bar of Wisconsin

State Bar of Wisconsin

My Media My CLETracker My Profile My Memberships My Dues My History My Staff Log Out

Back to Main Navigation

Overview Diversity and Inclusion Leadership Reports Government Relations Membership Awards and Recognition

Back to Main Navigation

Membership & Benefits Sections, Divisions, Committees For State Bar Leaders Legal Resources Ethics Lawyer Referral Programs Practice411 Pro Bono Lawyer Assistance (WisLAP) Client Protection / Fee Disputes Financial Reports

Back to Main Navigation

CLE Seminars Books and Forms Practice Area Resources Practice Management Advertise With Us

News & Publications

Back to Main Navigation

Wisconsin Lawyer InsideTrack Blogs & Podcast Rotunda Report WisLawNOW Official Notices CaseLaw Express Social Media Contribute Archive

Back to Main Navigation

I Need a Lawyer I Have a Dispute with my Lawyer I Need Information For Educators For Paralegals Help for Lawyers & Law Students Free/Reduced Help

Lawyer Search Legal Resources Directories Careers Contact Us

Back to Main Navigation

my Media my CLETracker my Profile my Memberships my Dues my History my Staff Log Out

Home > News & Publications > InsideTrack > Article

March 12, 2025

March 12, 2025
Justice Hagedorn Opines that There Are No Procedural Bars to Disclosure Under Public Records Laws
Justice Hagedorn opines in a solo concurrence in Wis. Voter Alliance v. Secord that the common-law legal requirements for a writ of mandamus do not affect public records cases.
Share This:
A
A
A
Email
Print
Save
Comments (0)
Share This:
Facebook
Tweet
linkedIn
Inside Track

Join the conversation! Log in to comment.

GO TO THE ARCHIVE

News & Pubs Search

Keyword Search:

Show Advanced Filters

Source:

Search Prior to 2002

Topic:

Date Range:

-

Format: MM/DD/YYYY

Advertise With Us