Legal Writing
Common Confusing Usage Rules
Some rules bear
repeating: fewer and less, affect and effect, correspond to and
correspond with, different from and different than, and oral and verbal
are just a few.
by Mary Barnard Ray
In upstate New York, beside a spectacular mountain lake, sits Mohonk
Mountain House, a Victorian resort with a dress-for-dinner code and a
strict Victorian maitre d' to enforce that code. I still remember,
although it has been a decade since that time, walking down the long
hallway toward that maitre d's ramrod form, two youngsters in tow,
watching for his solemn nod and slight turning of the body, which meant
we had met with his approval and could enter for dinner.
Whenever I prepare to talk about proper word usage, I remember that
maitre d'. I try to assume his demeanor so that I can, with grace and
unerring dignity, explain the rules. Impossible. I remain the uncertain
mother shepherding her youngsters through the door. So it is that, with
all due humility, I approach this month's topic: some of the most common
confusing usage rules.
Fewer and Less
Fewer is proper when referring to items viewed as individual
units.
"Stagnant salaries and creeping inflation leave workers with fewer
dollars to spend."
Less refers to a concept, rather than individual units.
"Increasing taxes leave workers with less money for discretionary
purchases."
Affect and Effect
These two words can confuse anyone. Fortunately, in legal writing
effect is usually the correct noun, while affect is
the correct verb.
Effect as a noun means an inevitable result of
something or, in the phrase in effect, it means in
operation. These are the two meanings usually intended in legal
writing:
"This law went into effect in January 1999."
"The effect of this new law has not been what was expected."
Affect as a noun means a feeling, and is more
common in writing related to psychology.
Affect as a verb means to produce an effect upon
something. This is the meaning usually needed in legal writing.
"Seeing this tragedy affected the plaintiff's ability to concentrate,
ultimately leading to his loss of employment."
Occasionally legal writing uses affect to mean to
pretend, as in the following sentence.
"Although the plaintiff affected feelings of sadness, in fact he
benefited from the tragedy."
Effect as a verb means to cause the existence of
something, which is less frequently needed in legal writing,
usually in statements of the writer's opinion, as in law review
articles.
"This shift in the burden of proof would effect profound changes in
the outcome of these liability cases."
Correspond To and Correspond With
People correspond with other people. Ideas or things
correspond to other things.
"The sisters corresponded with the company for six months, trying to
explain the situation."
"The increase in the average social worker's caseload corresponds to
this change in the sentencing laws."
Different From and Different Than
Mary Barnard Ray is a legal
writing lecturer and director of the Legal Writing Individualized
Instruction Services at the U.W. Law School. Her publications include
two coauthored legal writing books, Getting It Right and Getting It
Written and Beyond the Basics, published by West
Publishing Co.
If you have a writing problem that you can't resolve, email or send your question to
Ms. Ray, c/o Wisconsin Lawyer, State Bar of Wisconsin, P.O. Box
7158, Madison, WI 53707-7158. Your question and Ms. Ray's response will
be published in this column. Readers who object to their names being
mentioned should state so in their letters.
Use different from, because it is always considered
correct.
"Chocolate differs from cocoa."
"Writing novels requires a process substantially different
from that needed for writing legal briefs."
Different than is considered correct in some cases and by
some sources, but it is likely that your reader will not be aware of
those exceptions. But, if you do want to use different than,
several sources say it is permitted when it is a shortened version of
some longer phrase that would be awkward to use, such as different
than the way that is within, as in the following example.
"Use no word different than your understanding."
Since the phrase will probably still sound awkward, try instead to
rephrase it.
"Use no word without understanding its meaning."
Oral and Verbal
Legal writers usually need to use oral. Although mentioned in an
earlier column, this common confusion deserves further explanation.
Oral describes something spoken, in contrast to something
written. This is the meaning most legal writers want to communicate.
"This [written] contract supercedes any oral agreements made between
the parties."
Verbal describes something expressed in words, which can be
oral or written. Thus verbal is accurately used when
contrasting verbal and nonverbal communication,
"The taxi driver punctuated his verbal comments with nonverbal
gestures."
Now that you know how to use these terms accurately, you can practice
in your next documents and celebrate any solemn nods of approval that
come your way.
Wisconsin
Lawyer