|
|
Vol. 74, No. 10, October 2001
|
Supreme Court Orders
The Wisconsin Supreme Court sets a public hearing for Nov. 13 to consider:
1) petitions and amendments to the statutes to consolidate statutes that
impose sanctions, 2) changes to the Supreme Court Rules regarding eligibility
for appointment as guardian ad litem, and 3) changes to the statutes regarding
publication of court of appeals opinions and regarding petitions for review.
Consolidating
statutes that impose sanctions
In
the matter of the amendment of Wis. Stat. §§ 230.85, 767.293, 802.10,
804.01, 804.05, 804.08, 804.09, 804.11, 804.12, 805.03, 806.38, 807.21,
707.22, 807.23, 809.25, 814.025, 814.04, 814.29, and 911.01 relating to
the consolidation of statutes governing the imposition of sanctions in
actions and proceedings.
Order
99-07
On
Dec. 1, 1999, the Judicial Council filed a petition seeking to amend and
consolidate several statutes governing the imposition of sanctions in
actions and proceedings. On Oct. 30, 2000, the Judicial Council filed
an amended petition.
IT IS ORDERED that a public
hearing on the petition shall be held in the Supreme Court Room in the
State Capitol, Madison, Wis., on Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2001, at 9:30 a.m.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
the court's conference in the matter shall be held promptly following
the public hearing on rules petitions 99-07 and 01-07.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
notice of the hearing be given by publication of a copy of this order
and of the amended petition in the official state newspaper once each
week for three consecutive weeks and in an official publication of the
State Bar of Wisconsin not more than 60 days nor less than 30 days before
the date of the hearing.
Dated at Madison, Wis., this
4th day of September, 2001.
By
the court:
Cornelia G. Clark, Clerk of
Supreme Court
Amended
Petition 99-07
The Judicial Council, pursuant
to its authority under s. 758.13, Wis. Stats. to receive, consider and
in its discretion investigate suggestions from any source pertaining to
the administration of justice and to recommend changes in the statutes
and rules governing procedure in the courts of Wisconsin, hereby petitions
the court to adopt the following statutory changes under s. 751.12, Wis.
Stats.,
SECTION 1. 230.85(3)(b) of the statutes is amended to read:
230.85(3)(b) If, after hearing,
the commission finds that the respondent did not engage in or threaten
a retaliatory action it shall order the complaint dismissed. The commission
shall order the employee's appointing authority to insert a copy of the
findings and orders into the employee's personnel file and, if the respondent
is a natural person, order the respondent's appointing authority to insert
such a copy into the respondent's personnel file. If the commission finds
by unanimous vote that the employee filed a frivolous complaint it may
order payment of the respondent's reasonable actual attorney fees and
actual costs. Payment may be assessed against either the employee or the
employee's attorney, or assessed so that the employee and the employee's
attorney each pay a portion. To find a complaint frivolous the commission
must find that either s. 814.025(3)(a)
or (b) 807.23(1)(b)1.
or 2. applies or that both s. 814.025(3)(a)
and (b) 807.23(1)(b)1.
and 2. apply.
Note:
Subsection (3) is amended by inserting a cross-reference to subch. 11
of ch. 807, where sanction provisions are consolidated.
SECTION 2. 767.293(6) of the statutes is amended to read:
767.293(6) Section 814.025
807.23 applies to the
filing of an affidavit under this section.
SECTION 3. 802.10(7) of the
statutes is amended to read:
802.10(7) SANCTIONS. Violations
of a scheduling or pretrial order are subject to ss.
802.05, 804.12 and 805.03 subch.
II of ch. 807.
SECTION 4. 804.01(2)(c)2. and
(3)(b) of the statutes are amended to read:
804.01(2)(c)2. A party may
obtain, without the required showing, a statement concerning the action
or its subject matter previously made by that party. Upon request, a person
who is not a party may obtain without the required showing a statement
concerning the action or its subject matter previously made by that person.
If the request is refused, the person may move for a court order. Section
804.12(1)(c) 807.22(1)(c)
applies to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion. For
purposes of this paragraph, a statement previously made is a written statement
signed or otherwise adopted or approved by the person making it, or a
stenographic, mechanical, electrical, or other recording, or a transcription
thereof, which is a substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement
by the person making it and contemporaneously recorded.
(3)(b) If the motion for a
protective order is denied in whole or in part, the court may, on such
terms and conditions as are just, order that any party or person provide
or permit discovery. Section 804.12(1)(c)
807.22(1)(c) applies to
the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
SECTION 5. 804.05(5) of the
statutes is amended to read:
804.05(5) MOTION TO TERMINATE
OR LIMIT EXAMINATION. At any time during the taking of the deposition,
on motion of a party or of the deponent and upon a showing that the examination
is being conducted in bad faith or in such manner as unreasonably to annoy,
embarrass, or oppress the deponent or party, the court in which the action
is pending may order the officer conducting the examination to cease forthwith
from taking the deposition, or may limit the scope and manner of the taking
of the deposition as provided in s. 804.01(3). If the order made terminates
the examination, it shall be resumed thereafter only upon the order of
the court in which the action is pending. Section 804.12(1)(c)
807.22(1)(c) applies to
the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
SECTION 6. 804.08(1)(b) of
the statutes is amended to read:
804.08(1)(b) Each interrogatory
shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it
is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated
in lieu of an answer. The answers are to be signed by the person making
them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them. The party
upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the
answers, and objections if any, within 30 days after the service of the
interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers or objections
within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant.
The court may allow a shorter or longer time. The party submitting the
interrogatories may move for an order under s. 804.12(1)
807.22(1) with respect
to any objection to or other failure to answer an interrogatory.
SECTION 7. 804.09(2) of the
statutes is amended to read:
804.09(2) PROCEDURE. Except
as provided in s. 804.015, the The
request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after
commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service
of the summons and complaint upon that party. The request shall specify
a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing
the related acts. The party upon whom the request is served shall serve
a written response within 30 days after the service of the request, except
that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of
the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter
or longer time. The response shall state, with respect to each item or
category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as
requested, unless the request is objected to, in which event the reasons
for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item
or category, the part shall be specified. The party submitting the request
may move for an order under s. 804.12(1)
807.22(1) with respect
to any objection to or other failure to respond to the request or any
part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested.
SECTION 8. 804.11(1)(b) and
(c) of the statutes are amended to read:
804.11(1)(b) Each matter of
which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter
is admitted unless, within 30 days after service of the request, or within
such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom
the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission
a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party
or attorney, but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall
not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of
45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant.
If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer
shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons
why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A
denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and
when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a
part of the matter of which an admission is requested, the party shall
specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An
answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason
for failure to admit or deny unless the party states that he or she had
has made reasonable inquiry
and that the information known or readily obtainable by the party is insufficient
to enable the party to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter
of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for
trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; the party
may, subject to s. 804.12(3)
807.22(3) deny the matter
or set forth reasons why the party cannot admit or deny
it.
(c) The party who has requested
the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or
objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified,
it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that
an answer does not comply with this section, it may order either that
the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court
may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the
request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior
to trial. Section 804.12(1)(c)
807.22(1)(c) applies to
the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
SECTION 9. 804.12 of the statutes
is renumbered 807.22.
SECTION 10. 804.13 of the statutes
is created to read:
804.13 FAILURE TO MAKE DISCOVERY;
SANCTIONS. Motions to compel discovery or requesting sanctions for discovery
violations shall be determined under ss. 807.21 and 807.22.
SECTION 11. 805.03 of the statutes
is repealed.
SECTION 12. 806.3 8(2) of the
statutes is amended to read:
806.3 8(2) Notwithstanding
sub. (1), an increase or decrease in the amount of prejudgment interest
otherwise payable may be made in a foreign-money judgment to the extent
required by s. 802.05, 805.03
or 807.01.
SECTION 13. Subchapter I (title)
of chapter 807 of the statutes is created to read:
CHAPTER
807
CIVIL
PROCEDURE MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SUBCHAPTER 1
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SECTION 14. Subchapter II of
chapter 807 [precedes 807.21] of the statutes is created to read:
CHAPTER
807
SUBCHAPTER II
SANCTIONS AND FRIVOLOUS
PROCEEDINGS
807.21 SANCTIONS. (1). APPLICABILITY.
The court may impose a sanction under this section against a person who
violates s. 802.05(1) or 802.10(3)(b), who files a frivolous pleading
or appeal under s. 807.23 or 809.25(3), who fails to prosecute a claim
made in an action or proceeding, who fails to comply with the statutes
and rules governing procedure in actions or proceedings, or who fails
to obey an order of any court of record.
(2) WHO MAY BE SANCTIONED.
The court may impose a sanction under this section against an attorney,
a party represented by an attorney, or an unrepresented party who is responsible
for a violation or failure under sub. (1).
(3) SANCTIONS AVAILABLE. After
a hearing conducted in accordance with subs. (4) and (5), a court may
do any of the following:
(a) Order adjournments, continuances
of the trial or other proceedings, or reopening of discovery.
(b) Award reasonable costs,
including expert and other witness fees, costs incurred in the preparation
or copying of medical reports, and other costs under s. 814.036.
(c) Award reasonable attorney
fees and expenses.
(d) Strike pleadings, claims,
motions or other papers.
(e) Exclude witnesses or evidence.
(f) Dismiss claims. A dismissal
under this section is an adjudication on the merits unless the court specifies
otherwise in its order.
(g) Grant judgment.
(h) Make any other order that
justice requires.
(4) FACTORS. The court shall
consider all of the following factors in determining the appropriate sanctions
under this section:
(a) Whether the violation or
failure under sub. (1) was intentional, reckless, negligent or inadvertent.
(b) The consequences resulting
from the violation or failure under sub. (1).
(c) When the person became
aware of the violation or failure under sub. (1) and whether and how promptly
the person attempted to remedy the violation or failure.
(d) The financial circumstances
of the person, if the sanction ordered involves the payment of money.
(e) Any other pertinent circumstances,
whether mitigating or aggravating.
(5) MOTION; HEARING. A motion
for a sanction under this section may be brought along with other motions
to compel. A motion for a sanction shall specify the conduct that is alleged
to constitute the violation or failure under sub. (1) and the sanction
that is sought under sub. (3). Upon the filing of the motion, or upon
the court's own order for a hearing, the court shall schedule a hearing
before determining a sanction. The order for the hearing shall specify
the conduct believed to constitute the violation or failure. A sanction
may be imposed only after a hearing.
Note:
This omnibus sanction statute is based on several provisions in prior
law, as well as portions of Rule 11, F.R. Civ. P. The reference to "claim"
in sub. (1) is intended to include those made in cross-complaints and
counterclaims. "Court of record" includes a circuit court, the court of
appeals or the supreme court. For guidance on what constitutes a "reasonable"
attorney fee under sub. (3)(c), see Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express
Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974); Hensley v. Eckhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983).
Subsections (1) to (5)
are prior s. 804.12, renumbered for placement with other sanction provisions.
807.22 (6) CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION. Discovery motions shall be accompanied
by a written statement by the moving party that, after good faith consultation
with the opposing party, the parties are unable to agree. The statement
shall also recite the date, time and manner of the consultation and the
names of all parties participating in the consultation.
807.23 FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS.
(1) In this section:
(a) "Court" means a circuit
court, the court of appeals or the supreme court.
(b) "Frivolous" means a pleading
that meets one of the following conditions:
1. The pleading was commenced,
filed, used or continued in bad faith, solely to harass or maliciously
injure another.
2. The pleading was without
reasonable basis in law or equity and which the party, or the party's
attorney, knows or should know cannot be supported by a good faith argument
for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.
3. The pleading was not well
grounded in fact and there has been no reasonable inquiry into its factual
basis by the party or the party's attorney.
(c) "Pleading" means a document
listed in s. 802.01(1), motions under s. 802.01(2) and any document submitted
to the court related to an action, special proceeding, claim, counterclaim,
cross-claim, defense, motion, appeal or cross-appeal.
(2) If the court finds that
a pleading is frivolous, the court shall strike or dismiss the pleading
and may impose one or more sanctions under s. 807.21 on the party or attorney
responsible for its filing or continuance. The court may apportion liability
for costs, fees, attorney fees and other monetary sanctions between the
party and the attorney, as appropriate. Absent exceptional circumstances,
the members of a law firm shall be jointly liable for frivolous pleadings
filed or continued by its partners, associates and employees.
(3)(a) A party may move the
court for the imposition of sanctions. A motion made under this section
shall specify the pleading alleged to be frivolous, one or more of the
grounds under sub. (1)(b) as to why the pleading is frivolous, and the
sanctions sought by the movant. The moving party shall support the motion
by affidavit based on personal knowledge.
(b) A motion alleging grounds
under sub. (2)(b)2 or 3 may not be filed unless notice of intent to file
the motion is served on the party against whom a sanction is sought at
least 14 days, or such other longer period as the court may prescribe,
before the motion is filed with the court and the party against whom a
sanction is sought has not withdrawn or appropriately corrected the pleading.
(c) A motion alleging a frivolous
appeal shall be filed not later than the date on which the respondent's
brief is filed. A motion under this section alleging a frivolous cross-appeal
shall be filed not later than the date that the cross-respondent's brief
is filed. All other motions alleging a frivolous pleading shall be filed
before entry of judgment, unless an earlier time is specified in a scheduling
order.
Note:
This section is a restatement of provisions in Chs. 802, 809 and 814,
Stats., 1993. Its coverage is expanded to include motions and other papers,
which are defined as "pleadings." Subsection (1)(b)3 is new, but akin
to the requirement in s. 802.05 that pleadings certify reasonable inquiry
into the facts and law upon which they are based. Subsection (2) makes
dismissal mandatory, and allows the court to impose additional sanctions
under the new omnibus sanction statute, s. 807.21. Subsection (3) incorporates
the "safe harbor" feature of Rule 11(c)(1)(A), F.R. Civ. P. The safe harbor
is inapplicable if the pleading is alleged to have been filed in bad faith,
solely to harass or maliciously injure another. The time periods in sub.
(3)(c) for appeals and cross-appeals are based on s. 809.25(3). The final
sentence is new. Prior s. 814.025 was vague on the timing of such motions,
but did specify that a finding of frivolousness could be made "at any
time during the proceedings or upon judgment."
SECTION 15. 809.25(3)(a) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to
read:
809.25(3) FRIVOLOUS APPEALS.
(a) if the court finds that an appeal or cross-appeal is frivolous, the
court shall dismiss the appeal or cross-appeal and may impose sanctions
under s. 807.23.
Note:
Sanctions for frivolous pleadings are prescribed in subch. II of ch. 807.
SECTION 16. Section 814.025 of the statutes is repealed.
Note:
Sanctions for frivolous pleadings and appeals are prescribed in subch.
II of ch. 807.
SECTION 17. 814.04 of the statutes is amended to read:
814.04 ITEMS OF COSTS. Except
as provided in ss. 93.20, 100.30(5m), 106.04(6)(I) and (6m)(a), 115.80(9),
769.313, 807.23, 814.025,
814.245, 895.035(4), 895.75(2), 895.77(2), 895.79(3), 895.80(3),
943.212(2)(b), 943.245(2)(d) and 943.51(2)(b), when allowed costs shall
be as follows:
SECTION 18. 814.29(3)(a) of
the statutes is amended to read:
814.29(3)(a) A request for
leave to commence or defend an action, proceeding, writ of error or appeal
without being required to pay fees or costs or to give security for costs
constitutes consent of the affiant and counsel for the affiant that if
the judgment is in favor of the affiant the court may order the opposing
party to first pay the amount of unpaid fees and costs, including attorney
fees under ss. 802.05, 804.12(1)(c)
and 814.025, 807.22(1)(c)
and under 42 U.S.C. 1988 and to pay the balance to the plaintiff.
Note:
Subsection (3)(a) is amended by inserting a cross-reference to subch.
II of ch. 807, where sanction provisions are consolidated.
SECTION 19. 911.01(4)(c) of the statutes is amended to read:
911.01(4)(c) Miscellaneous
Proceedings. Proceedings for extradition or rendition; sentencing, or
granting or revoking probation, issuance of arrest warrants, criminal
summonses and search warrants; proceedings
on motions for sanctions under subch. II of ch. 807; proceedings
under s. 971.14(1)(c); proceedings with respect to pretrial release under
ch. 969 except where habeas corpus is utilized with respect to release
on bail or as otherwise provided in ch. 969.
Note:
Subsection (4)(c) is amended to exempt proceedings on motions for sanctions
from the rules of evidence, other than ch. 905 with respect to privileges.
Respectfully
submitted,
Judicial Council
By James C. Alexander
|