Vol. 71, No. 10,
October 1998
Navigating the Career Choice Maze
By Karen Bankston
Attorneys have more career choices than ever before, but it may take
some soul searching to find your perfect path. |
Kit Keller never envisioned for herself a traditional law career. Even in
law school, "I never saw myself as a trial lawyer or, for that matter,
in private practice." Still, she did not foresee the many turns her
career would take, and continues to take. That's what brought her in July
to the seminar "What Do You Want to Do Next with Your Law Degree?"
The Madison workshop, cosponsored by State Bar of Wisconsin CLE Seminars
and the State Bar Young Lawyers Division, featured speaker attorney Deborah
Arron, author of What Can You Do with a Law Degree? and Running
from the Law. Keller, who graduated from law school in 1982, worked
for five years with the Indiana Public Defender Council, doing research,
writing, and consulting for criminal defense attorneys representing indigent
clients. Then she moved to Washington, D.C., to write with the Bureau of
National Affairs (BNA) on the Criminal Defense Manual, Civil Trial Manual,
and the Criminal Law Reporter.
A circuitous route
Like many attorneys who change course, Keller traveled a circuitous route
to where she is today. Keller left the BNA in 1989, intending to focus full
time on renovating an old house she and her architect husband had purchased.
"I casually mentioned this career change in our Christmas letter,"
she recalls. "Within the month, without further marketing, I began
receiving calls to do consulting work and/or writing on public policy issues."
Keller moved to Wisconsin in 1993 after her husband accepted a job in
Cedarburg. She continued to work with her national clients until she "decided
to explore what citizen participation was all about." That led to a
campaign for a seat on the Cedarburg Common Council, which she held for
two years.
Most recently, she worked for two years with the Ozaukee County Transportation
Management Association, a public-private partnership to introduce public
transit service between Milwaukee and Ozaukee County. Now that the project
has been transferred to county management, Keller finds herself fixing up
yet another old house and pondering her next career move.
More attitude than action
Success in changing careers "has a lot more to do with attitude
than with action," Arron told the 300 participants in the "What
Do You Want to Do Next With Your Law Degree?" workshop. Arron's book,
What Can You Do with a Law Degree?, suggests self-exploration, research,
and marketing techniques to track down the right career path for you - inside
or outside of the law.
Arron shares memories of her own career change from a Seattle law practice
to writing her first book, Running from the Law. She recalls weekends
"when I woke up on Saturday and thought, 'Oh, no, I have to go back
to work Monday morning.'"
Arron's dream back then was that someone would offer her a high-paying
dream job where she would continue to practice law without ever having to
worry about billing, collections, research, or writing briefs, all the things
she disliked most about her current work.
Her advice to fellow lawyers: "Look for a career that feeds you
well in all the ways you want to be fed." Arron's suggestions are designed
not just for lawyers who are ready to leave their current practice, but
for anyone who is "conscious of a future when what you're doing will
not be as satisfying and fulfilling as it is now."
According to Arron, three steps are required for a successful transition:
1) Self-assessment, which encompasses identifying the qualities you
look for in a good place to work and articulating what type of work you
want and don't want in terms of values and interests;
2) Research into the duties, requirements, and needs of employers in
the new field you're considering and how you fit with those requirements;
and
3) Implementation - the proactive search for your next job.
Being action-oriented people, most lawyers tend to want to jump over
the first two steps right to implementation, Arron notes. Some attorneys
may be so desperately unhappy in their current position that they may feel
they don't have the luxury to explore their options.
In addition, Arron maintains, law school training discourages self-assessment
by instilling respect for past decisions and legal analysis unclouded by
feelings, thus limiting one's ability to consider options without boundaries.
Taking the time for a thorough self-assessment has a built-in reward,
she contends. Knowing what you want to do and what you can contribute builds
a sense of can-do enthusiasm. That energy and enthusiasm creates the mutual
excitement with prospective employers that will get you the job you want.
Self-assessment narrows the scope of your search and keeps it moving
in the right direction, Arron adds. Consider the roots of your dissatisfaction
and what type of job might suit you better.
For example, Keller knows from past experience that she's in her element
when she's working to "help other people succeed in a project that's
important to them." She knows she enjoys sifting through policy issues
and helping to develop a larger perspective.
Keller also knows she prefers short-term assignments rather than long-term
career moves. When the task at hand is finite, "then it's like an adventure,"
she says.
Jane Pribeck left her job with a law firm last year to take time for
"a lot of soul searching." She felt pigeon-holed in the practice
of family law; except for writing briefs and letters to opposing counsel,
"I didn't like what I was doing."
"I miss the feeling that you get when things work out well for a
client, and that's about it," says Pribeck, who landed her "dream
job" as editor-in-chief of Wisconsin Opinions about a year ago.
"I felt bad about billing clients for trivial things, and that's
no way to advance your career," she adds with a laugh.
Look inward
Arron boils the self-assessment process down to three central questions:
- Who am I?
- What do I want?
- What am I willing to give up to get what I want?
Powerful forces can be at work in that final question. Participants in
the July workshop quickly listed a variety of factors that might keep people
in a job they detest: salary, health insurance and retirement benefits,
vacation time, independence, power, prestige, security, location, flexibility.
"You're
always going to give up something," Arron warns. "You have to
find something that's so appealing it'll keep you moving forward."
"I am not a believer that you can have it all at the same time,"
she adds. "I don't think, for instance, that you can be the best lawyer
and the best parent at the same time. You have to be clear about what you
want first."
The comfort of a regular paycheck and job security can be hard to leave
behind, agrees Margaret Watt McKenna, a Milwaukee attorney who opened a
solo practice last year. Before she made the move, McKenna admits, she thought
about going solo as "jumping for a rope you don't know is going to
be there."
"Some people can't fathom leaving behind the certainty of a salary
and the career development and professional growth you expect from your
law firm," she notes.
McKenna's then-fiancé, now-husband, had practical concerns about
her decision to strike out on her own. He questioned the financial implications
of leaving the law firm. McKenna's response? "I just kept saying, 'Be
calm. This will work out.'"
About the economics of career moves, Arron maintains that almost no field
pays less than starting out in law. Conversely, there's almost nowhere you
can transfer - outside the law or sometimes even to another practice area
within the law - and earn the same amount of money as your current position.
"Prepare yourself financially and don't let money be an object,"
Arron advises. Her theory of a "financial comfort zone" holds
that most people return to a salary level with which they are satisfied
within two years after making a job change.
In addition, Arron adds, if you've done your homework in terms of self-assessment
and research you should be able to justify a higher salary to prospective
employers by specifying how you can deliver what they need.
Self-assessment combines emotional considerations and steely-eyed analysis.
Its foremost goal is to discover what you bring to the table - what you've
got that's valuable to potential employers or clients, Arron says.
Next Page
|