Effectively Managing Criticism
Here are five suggestions that can help restore civility to law office relationships
when responding to harsh, inappropriate, or ad hominem criticism.
by Ellen Ostrow
"BEING HURT BY ANGER AND criticism is not gender-specific. Secretary
of defense nominee Bobby Ray Inman withdrew his nomination because he
did not want to deal with what he regarded as extreme and unfair attacks.
This sparked a new round of criticism of him for being too 'thin-skinned.'
In this connection, columnist Meg Greenfield wrote that 'thin skin is
the only kind of skin human beings come with.' " 1
Countless attorneys have described their ongoing concerns about being
harshly criticized by angry partners in their firms. Some attorneys were
dressed down, loudly and harshly, in front of other lawyers in the firm.
When I suggest that they respond by setting limits, they insist that any
statement of protest will be taken as confirmation that they're "not tough
enough" to be successful in the firm. Not surprisingly, many of these
attorneys conclude that the only way to protect themselves from verbal
assault is to change professions.
This belief creates a lose-lose situation for any attorney who accepts
it. If you tolerate verbal abuse, it will undermine your confidence and
distract you from the work to which your gifts, passion, and training
have led you. Tolerating this kind of criticism doesn't demonstrate your
toughness; rather, it signals that you are afraid of responding, leading
your critic to believe that she or he can treat you like that again.
As we all know, abusive criticism is ineffective. Management literature
abounds with evidence that recognition of success encourages more success
and that feelings of powerlessness and humiliation interfere with productivity.
The fact is, standing up for yourself in the face of unwarranted or inappropriately
harsh criticism is a sign that you are "tough enough." A carefully planned
approach to this situation can be extremely effective.
You can learn to handle your "critics" with the same kind of skill that
makes you successful in advocating for your clients. "Emotionally intelligent"
responses to verbal assaults can increase the probability of your success
in your firm, and in legal practice in general.
Responding to Criticism
Here are some suggestions about how to respond to harsh, inappropriate,
or ad hominem criticism:
1. Accept that feeling hurt is not a sign of your failure. Try
to take criticism less personally. That does not mean it shouldn't hurt.
Everyone feels humiliated when treated disrespectfully. But don't attribute
this kind of criticism to your own failure. Even if you made a mistake,
no one deserves to be treated unjustly.
Often, the attorneys who speak in a demeaning manner may not even be
aware of their style or its impact. If you hear the criticism as malicious,
you'll feel hamstrung. Consider the possibility that what you're hearing
is the uncontrolled voice of an overworked and stressed partner who has
no idea how he comes across.
Above all, don't buy into the idea that being hurt means you're not
"tough enough" or a good-enough lawyer. All it means is that you're human.
2. Wait for your critic to cool down. Let the person criticizing
you cool down before you respond. Communicate your willingness to address
substantive issues, but use your "social radar" to gauge the other person's
readiness to resolve the conflict. Sometimes the best you can say is,
"I can see you're upset. Let's meet tomorrow to discuss this."
3. Respond to the complaint. Distinguish between the "what" and
the "how" of the criticism. If the complaint has merit, take appropriate
responsibility. But don't be self-denigrating. Communicate your genuine
regret about any mistakes you made - but keep them in perspective.
It's also important to communicate your desire to learn and your need
for training and mentoring. Lawyers under pressure can have very unrealistic
expectations of less experienced attorneys. All you can do is your best
- acknowledge your limitations, and seek information and guidance from
mentors. You're less likely to make egregious errors this way.
4. Respond to how the complaint was expressed. The "how" refers
to the manner in which the criticism is delivered. If the tone or wording
is inappropriate or disrespectful - regardless of its validity - then
you need to address this.
Try to assess your critic's mood and receptiveness. Be sure you're calm
enough to show a willingness to work things out. Plan a response that
is diplomatic and tactful. Try to reduce defensiveness with a softened
"start up" - thank the other person for her willingness to discuss the
issue. It's important to state your concerns in neutral language and with
a nonargumentative tone.
You might say something like, "I know you were really upset about ...
and I can understand that. I'm sure you didn't intend to be hurtful, but
I wonder if you realize how demoralizing it can be to be on the receiving
end of your criticism when you're that upset. I'd really like us to maintain
a good working relationship. Can we talk about other ways we can handle
problems when they come up?"
This kind of response usually meets with some embarrassment and regret.
Move on to something else quickly enough to allow your "critic" to save
face. If you've received some kind of apology, and most likely you will,
then you've created a more respectful and equitable relationship.
If your "critic" reacts defensively, then it's probably time to talk
to people in the firm with whom you've forged alliances. If they justify
her behavior and criticize your reaction, you may want to consider working
elsewhere. Most likely, other lawyers will want to support you. But don't
expect them to be openly critical of their colleagues. They'll probably
prefer to handle things behind the scenes.
5. Be optimistic and confident. It's easiest to practice self-advocacy
when you're optimistic and self-confident. By optimism, I mean that you're
able to generate possible solutions to a problem, rather than resigning
yourself to helplessness. Colleagues, mentors, and coaches can help you
generate solutions when you're having difficulty doing so on your own.
Self-confidence comes from a clear recognition of your talents, gifts,
and skills. Make a list of all the assets you bring to your firm and your
profession and update this regularly. If you're a young associate this
might be difficult. A coach can help you accomplish this.
Your confidence will increase each time you successfully handle conflict.
Avoidance, on the other hand, is not confidence-building. Doing something
difficult and anxiety-producing strengthens your ability to handle tough
situations - with your cases or with your colleagues.
Endnotes
1 Deborah Tannen, Talking from 9 to 5 - Women
and Men in the Workplace: Language, Sex and Power, Avon Books, 1994,
p. 190.
|