Sign In
  • December 05, 2024

    Federal Court Blocks Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement Nationwide

    A federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas has temporarily blocked enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act. Kelly Gorman discusses the injunction and what it means for businesses’ reporting requirements.

    Kelly Gorman

    gavel

    Our firm has been actively communicating with clients regarding – and monitoring multiple lawsuits challenging – the federal Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) ahead of its upcoming Jan. 1, 2025, reporting deadline for entities formed before Jan. 1, 2024.

    The CTA requires most entities to report their beneficial ownership information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

    Kelly Gorman headshot Kelly Gorman, U.W. 2023, is an associate attorney with Fox, O’Neill, & Shannon, S.C., in Milwaukee, where she focuses her practice on business law. She currently serves on the State Bar of Wisconsin Business Law Section Board of Directors.

    On Dec. 3, 2024, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al. (Case No. 4:24-cv-478 [E.D. Tex.]) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the CTA and its reporting obligations.

    This means that for now entities need not comply with the Jan. 1, 2025, reporting deadline.

    This ruling is not necessarily a surprise, considering the multiple other pending lawsuits challenging the law’s constitutionality (including lawsuits challenging the rule in Maine, Ohio, Michigan, and the 11th and 9th circuits).

    In issuing the order, the court ruled that the plaintiffs met the standard for a preliminary injunction by showing:

    • the CTA and its reporting rule threaten the plaintiffs with irreparable harm;

    • a substantial likelihood of success exists in their claims that the CTA is unconstitutional;

    • the threatened harm to plaintiffs in complying with the CTA outweighs any injury to the government; and

    • that preliminary injunctive relief will not harm the public.

    The court reasoned the law is likely unconstitutional as outside Congress’s power. It also noted the significant compliance costs the CTA imposes on businesses in preparing required reports.

    As of this writing, the U.S. Department of Justice has not indicated whether it will appeal this ruling. An appeal, however, seems likely.

    There will, no doubt, be more to come.

    This article was originally published on the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Business Law Blog. Visit the State Bar sections or the Business Law Section webpages to learn more about the benefits of section membership.






    Need help? Want to update your email address?
    Contact Customer Service, (800) 728-7788

    Business Law Section Blog is published by the State Bar of Wisconsin. To contribute to this blog, contact Kelly Gorman and review Author Submission Guidelines. Learn more about the Business Law Section or become a member.

    Disclaimer: Views presented in blog posts are those of the blog post authors, not necessarily those of the Section or the State Bar of Wisconsin. Due to the rapidly changing nature of law and our reliance on information provided by outside sources, the State Bar of Wisconsin makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or completeness of this content.

    © 2024 State Bar of Wisconsin, P.O. Box 7158, Madison, WI 53707-7158.

    State Bar of Wisconsin Logo

Join the conversation! Log in to leave a comment.

News & Pubs Search

-
Format: MM/DD/YYYY