State Budget includes several items of special
interest to State Bar members
October 31, 2007 – 2007 Act
20, the long-awaited 2007-09 state budget includes several items of
special interest to members of the State Bar and is equally notable for
some of the provisions dropped from the final version of the bill. The
budget passed
the Assembly with 23 Republicans and 37 Democrats voting in favor
and 29 Republicans and 10 Democrats voting against. The bill passed
the Senate on an 18-15 party-line vote and was signed
by Gov. Doyle on Oct. 25.
Good Things Included in the Budget
$1 million for Civil Legal Needs: Act 20
appropriates $1 million annually beginning in Fiscal Year 2008-09 (FY09)
to the Wisconsin Trust Account Foundation Inc. (WisTAF), which will
make grants to programs that provide civil legal services to indigent
persons. These amounts can be matched with other federal and private
grants. WisTAF was created in 1986 by the Wisconsin Supreme Court to
receive funds from the interest on lawyers' trust accounts.
State Bar President Tom Basting spoke out several times in favor of
funding for indigent civil legal services and the Bar’s “Bridging
the Justice Gap” report was cited by legislators on several
occasions in support of the provision. In July, President Basting released
a statement that noted the pro bono contributions made by Wisconsin
attorneys, but stressed that more support is needed to meet the needs
documented in the report. "In his budget, the governor proposed $1
million to fund civil legal services in Wisconsin,” he explained.
“While modest when compared to the need and the record of other
states, this will help offset the acute need for delivery of civil
legal services to Wisconsin residents. The State Bar of Wisconsin urges
all legislators to support this crucial first step toward greater
access to justice for all Wisconsin families."
Increased State Public Defender (SPD) Funding: The
final budget includes provisions addressing both staffing at the SPD and
private bar funding.
Increased Staff Positions. Using funding available as the
result of exempting the SPD from turnover reductions, the budget
creates 9.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) attorney positions and 3.0 FTE
legal secretary positions under the General Purpose Revenue (GPR)
funded trial representation appropriation. The additional positions
would allow SPD staff, rather than the private bar, to handle
caseload.
Private Bar Funding. Transfer $161,600 GPR in Fiscal Year
FY08 and $22,600 GPR in FY09, from the trial representation
appropriation to the private bar appropriation. Modify the SPD's GPR
funded private bar and investigator reimbursement biennial
appropriation by $171,800 GPR in FY08 and -$1,519,200 GPR in FY09 to
fully fund private bar costs during the biennium. The intent is to
mitigate the need for the SPD to maintain position vacancies to remain
within its operating budget. As a result, private bar costs are reduced
under the amendment.
Recreation of the Judicial Council as an Independent Agency:
The budget allocates one unclassified attorney
position and $78,200 in FY08, and $99,400 in FY09, to re-create the
Judicial Council as a separate agency. It creates both a GPR annual
general program operations appropriation and a federal aid continuing
appropriation under the Judicial Council. The final budget also provides
that the attorney must be a member in good standing of the State Bar of
Wisconsin, must be strictly nonpartisan, and may not make a campaign
finance contribution (as defined under state statute) to a candidate
for state or local office while employed by the Judicial Council. The
budget specifies that the Judicial Commission Executive Director would
no longer be required to provide staff services to the Judicial
Council. Further, Act 20 requires that the names of Judicial Council
members be certified to the Secretary of State by the Judicial Council
attorney, not the Executive Secretary of the Judicial Commission.
The 1995 state budget had deleted the positions and funding for the
Judicial Council and required Judicial Commission staff to provide
support functions for the Judicial Council and pay meeting expenses of
Judicial Council members. Subsequent action of the Legislature
restored
some supplies and services funding (currently $11,800 GPR annually) to
the Judicial Commission to offset meeting costs and other supplies and
services costs of the Judicial Council.
Increased Funding for Court Interpreter Reimbursement:
The budget provides $233,500 in FY08 and $298,000 in FY09 to
increase state reimbursement to counties for court interpreter services.
It also modifies statutory language to require that a court, in all
criminal and civil proceedings, provide an interpreter for a party or
witness who has limited English proficiency, regardless of indigence.
This modification will first apply to actions commenced on the
effective date of the bill.
Funding will be divided as follows: (a) $43,900 in FY08 and $82,400
in
FY09 for projected increased use of interpreters under current law;
and
(b) $189,600 in FY08 and $215,600 in FY09 to reimburse counties for
interpreters in all cases, regardless of indigence. Under prior law,
the state provided reimbursement to counties for interpreter services
for indigent persons in criminal, delinquency, protective services,
Chapter 48 (children's code), and Chapter 51 (alcohol, drug abuse,
developmental disabilities, and mental health) proceedings at a rate
of
$40 per hour for certified interpreters and $30 per hour for qualified
interpreters. Base funding for court interpreter reimbursements is
$827,100. Under the budget as finally enacted, total funding will be
$1,060,600 in FY08 and $1,125,100 in FY09.
Good Things Not Included in the
Budget
The final version of the budget does not include the $19 million in
circuit court support payments that would have come from an increase in
the real estate transfer fee (also not included in the final budget).
The practical impact of this decision is that counties will continue to
bear these costs.
Bad Things Not Included in the
Budget
The State Bar Board of Governors officially opposed a proposal to
consolidate most state agency attorneys into the Department of
Administration and this proposal was not included in the final budget.
A proposal to increase, by statute, the fee for medical record copies
from $0.31 per page to $1 per page also was dropped from the final bill
(the State Bar has adopted a position that supports setting these rates
by administrative rule, not by statute).
Miscellaneous Items Included in the Budget
- Two new circuit court branches; one for Kenosha County and one
for Juneau County.
- Elimination of the Revisor of Statutes and the transfer of that
office’s functions to the Legislative Reference Bureau and the
Legislative Council.
- Funding for 31 additional State Crime Lab DNA analysts previously
authorized by the Legislature.
For more information, contact the Public Affairs department.