Sign In
  • WisBar News
    September 16, 2009

    Plaintiffs’ brief filed in challenge to Wisconsin’s ‘diploma privilege’

    Sept. 16, 2009 – Following the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision to remand a challenge to the diploma privilege, graduates from out-of-state law schools have renewed their Commerce Clause argument.

    Plaintiffs’ brief filed in challenge to Wisconsin’s ‘diploma privilege’

    By Alex De Grand, Legal Writer, State Bar of Wisconsin

    Sept.16, 2009 – Plaintiffs filed a brief today in their challenge to Wisconsin’s “diploma privilege,” following the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision to remand the case to the federal district court.

    Proponents of the   diploma privilege, codified in SCR 40.03, contend that a diploma from an ABA-accredited law school whose curriculum includes the specific study of Wisconsin law is sufficient evidence of competency to practice in Wisconsin, eliminating the need for a bar exam. Challengers contest, among other issues, whether Wisconsin-specific law is actually taught that extensively to justify the privilege.

    Currently, only graduates of the law schools at Marquette and the University of Wisconsin are asserting the diploma privilege, although the rule is written to theoretically encompass others.

    A class of recent graduates from ABA-accredited schools outside Wisconsin who must take a bar exam to receive a Wisconsin law license have challenged the diploma privilege under the U.S. Constitution’s dormant commerce clause in Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki, 07-C-0211.

    In the newly filed brief, the plaintiffs ask for summary judgment on the question of whether Wisconsin discriminates against interstate commerce when it requires an examination of graduates from out-of-state law schools in subject areas not particular to Wisconsin law. That is, the plaintiffs contest the rationale for administering only to them the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE), which tests areas of federal and common law.

    Specifically, the plaintiffs ask the court to bar Wisconsin from enforcing SCR 40.04(2) which imposes the MBE and counting the MBE toward the requisite passing score on the bar exam. The plaintiffs also seek an injunction against bar examination fees attributable to the MBE and any examination questions testing federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code, or common law principles.

    The Wisconsin Attorney General’s reply brief may be filed by Oct. 7.



Join the conversation! Log in to leave a comment.

News & Pubs Search

-
Format: MM/DD/YYYY