Attorney Discipline: Nowhere to Turn
A grievance brings out strong reactions in a lawyer that seriously
erode a lawyer's objectivity. Advice from someone else is crucial to
overcoming the panic and the distortion caused by the emotions that
surround a grievance investigation.
By William H. Thedinga
"I felt like I had nowhere to turn," Alex Hamilton blurted. "I didn't
know what to do. I just froze," he confessed to attorney Dan Warren.
Alex had been referred to Dan Warren by a mutual friend, Jana
Schmidt. Jana had heard the panic in Alex's voice as he whispered about
the grievance that had been filed against him. Jana knew that Warren was
experienced in representing lawyers involved in disciplinary proceedings
and she asked Warren to see Alex.
Although upset about the situation, Alex tried to calmly explain the
background of the grievance. "I had a bad feeling about the client from
the beginning," he hesitated, shifting in his seat. "I did not like the
client. I wasn't sure about handling the case, but I took it. It was a
messy, difficult divorce. I did a good job," Alex insisted. "It was a
frustrating case and it took forever, but the final result was good. At
least I thought so.
"At the end of the divorce proceeding, some funds were transferred to
my trust account. They were from the sale of jointly owned real estate;
and we had an agreement about their disposition. I split the funds
according to the agreement and took my fees from my client's share,"
Alex explained. "I didn't think my client would have a problem with it.
But he did. He started calling me about it. I talked to him several
times about the bill, but then stopped taking his calls. He eventually
filed a grievance with the Board of Attorneys Professional
Responsibility."
Warren nodded. He'd heard similar stories.
"The grievance now has been referred to the district professional
responsibility committee," Warren said, bringing Alex up to date. "The
BAPR staff in Madison did an initial investigation of the grievance and
sent the materials from its investigation to the local district
committee." Warren held up a piece of paper. "The letter from BAPR to
the committee indicates that one of the rule violations being
investigated is failure to cooperate with the grievance
investigation."
Warren raised a bushy eyebrow. "You apparently did not respond to
several letters from BAPR," he admonished.
"I panicked," said Alex, his face reddening. "I had never been
involved in a grievance before. I didn't know what to do. I was shocked
and hurt - and mad!" Alex's eyes blazed. "I opened the first letter from
BAPR, but I didn't open the next letter. I finally told Jana about it
and she told me about you."
"Your reaction is not unusual," Warren soothed. "A grievance is a
real shock to the system, a kick in the gut. You aren't the first
attorney to freeze when the letter from BAPR arrives. One attorney told
me that he felt like a deer in a car's headlights and simply couldn't
move.
"But," Warren insisted, "even though you are in shock, you must
respond to BAPR, and respond promptly. As a friend of mine put it, 'the
red confidential stamp on the BAPR envelope means open me first.'
"Look," Warren said, "in a grievance investigation there are two
rules: respond promptly and cooperate fully. Failure to respond to and
cooperate with the BAPR investigator or the district committee
investigator is a serious problem. It is a frustration and irritation to
the investigator; and it can result in a separate disciplinary rule
violation for failure to cooperate with the investigation. The district
committee will want an explanation for your failure to respond to the
letters. You don't need this added trouble," Warren advised.
"I know," Alex agreed. "But I just don't understand how the grievance
procedure works. Like, what exactly is the district committee?"
"The district committee is made up of local attorneys and laypersons
appointed by the State Bar president," Warren explained. "There are 16
district committees statewide; and BAPR refers about 10 percent of
grievances to the committees. Grievances are referred to district
committees when further factual investigation is necessary and where the
input of local attorneys may be helpful," Warren continued, anticipating
Alex's questions.
"The local committee investigates grievances in this county and
several adjoining counties. The committee members understand the
practice of law in this area. The advantages of the committee system are
that grievances are investigated and evaluated by your peers and you
have the opportunity to speak to the committee in person."
"That's fine," Alex said, "but where's my grievance in the
process?"
"The next step with your grievance is to meet with the investigator
from the district committee," Warren answered. "The investigator is one
of the local attorneys who is a member of the committee. We'll meet with
the investigator at her office. She's asked us to bring your file and
trust account records.
"The investigator also will meet with the person who filed the
grievance," Warren continued. "Then she'll prepare a preliminary written
report to the committee. Neither the grievant nor the respondent
attorney receive a copy of the preliminary report. The preliminary
report can be terribly important in terms of the way the issues are
framed for the district committee," Warren impressed. "That's why we
want to present the facts and our analysis to the investigator as fully
and completely as possible."
As the afternoon sun glinted through his office window, Warren
continued his explanation of the district committee's role in
investigating grievances against attorneys. He explained that after the
preliminary report is prepared, the district committee schedules an
investigative meeting at which the committee considers evidence related
to the grievance. Both the grievant and the respondent attorney are
present at the meeting and each may bring witnesses.
The investigative meeting is not a judicial hearing. The formal rules
of evidence do not apply, and a court reporter normally is not used. The
committee member who served as investigator usually does most of the
questioning of the parties and any witnesses, but all committee members
are allowed to ask questions. The parties are not allowed to question
each other or the witnesses for each other, except if considered
appropriate at the discretion of the person chairing the investigative
meeting. All investigative meetings are confidential.
Following the investigative meeting, the committee prepares a final
report of its investigation. Usually the committee investigator writes
the report. The report is sent to BAPR; and BAPR forwards a copy to both
the grievant and the respondent attorney. Both parties may furnish
written comments on the committee's report.
The district committee also may make a recommendation to BAPR
concerning disposition of the grievance and appropriate discipline. "The
committee that I served on," Warren recollected, "always sent along a
recommendation with its final report. The recommendation is not a part
of the committee's final report and is not sent to the grievant or the
respondent attorney.
"The report and the recommendation from the district committee can be
very persuasive with BAPR. However, both the factual findings and the
recommendation of the committee are advisory only. BAPR makes an
independent determination about disposition of the grievance and
appropriate discipline," Warren concluded.
"I feel better knowing what I'm facing," Alex said, stretching. "I
had no idea what happens when a grievance is filed or referred to a
district committee. I'm glad Jana insisted I contact you."
"A lot of attorneys don't understand the grievance process," Warren
agreed. "I'm glad you called me, too; because it's so important for the
lawyer to contact someone. A lawyer who handles a grievance without
outside help is foolish.
"You saw for yourself how a grievance brings out strong reactions in
a lawyer - anger, panic, defensiveness, denial - all of which seriously
erode a lawyer's objectivity," Warren continued. "Objectivity and
perspective are what an outside advisor offers."
"You know, whatever happens here could potentially affect the rest of
my career," Alex said, rising from his chair and extending his hand.
"You're right," Warren agreed, shaking Alex's outstretched hand. "I'm
glad you called me."
Epilogue
Warren's two rules are critical when responding to a grievance: 1)
respond promptly; and 2) cooperate fully. A third rule is equally
important: seek outside advice.
A grievance brings out strong reactions in a lawyer that seriously
erode a lawyer's objectivity. Advice from someone else is crucial to
overcoming the panic and the distortion caused by the emotions that
surround a grievance investigation. An outside advisor's objectivity and
perspective can be invaluable.
Outside help often is necessary to implement the other two rules.
Outside help can give a needed push to respond promptly and to cooperate
fully when one's instincts are to do just the opposite. At each stage of
a grievance proceeding, an attorney must be as prepared as possible and
must present the facts completely. Preparation is much easier with an
advisor's help.
As threatening as it may seem, the grievance process is quite
informal at the district committee level, and the process is fair and
impartial. But it also is a process that takes the Rules of Professional
Responsibility seriously and treats rule violations seriously as
well.
An attorney involved in a grievance proceeding must understand the
seriousness of the process and the challenges involved. If you receive
notice of a grievance, contact someone for outside help. Contact someone
right away.
William H. Thedinga is a
1973 graduate of Harvard Law School, where he was president of the
Harvard Legal Aid Bureau. He practices in Menomonie, Wis., and is a
member of the District 8 Professional Responsibility Committee.
Wisconsin
Lawyer