Supreme Court Orders
The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hold a public hearing on March 17 on
the Director of State Courts' petition for alternative means of
reporting. The hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. in the Supreme Court
Room in the State Capitol, Madison, Wis.
Alternative Means of Reporting
In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules:
(proposed) SCR 71.05 - Alternative Means of Reporting
Order 97-11
On Dec. 9, 1997, the Director of State Courts filed a petition
requesting the creation of a rule to authorize the use of alternative
means of making a verbatim record of court proceedings in certain
circumstances and to provide for the maintenance and retention of those
records and for the preparation of transcripts of them. The proposed
rule would also require the Director of State Courts to promulgate and
publish standards for the use of alternative means of reporting. A set
of standards for the use of alternative means of reporting is attached
to the petition.
IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing on the petition shall be held in
the Supreme Court Room in the State Capitol, Madison, Wis., on March 17,
1998, at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court's conference in the matter shall
be held promptly following the public hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notice of the hearing be given by a single
publication of a copy of this order and of the petition and attachment
in the official state newspaper and in an official publication of the
State Bar of Wisconsin not more than 60 days nor less than 30 days
before the date of the hearing.
Dated at Madison, Wis., this 6th day of January, 1998.
By the court:
Marilyn L. Graves, Clerk of Court
Petition
The Director of State Courts hereby petitions the Court, pursuant to
its administrative authority over all courts conferred by Article VII,
sec. 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution, to create SCR 71.05 as
follows:
SCR 71.05 Alternative Means of Reporting
(1) Electronic means of making a verbatim record may be used as
follows:
- (a) with prior approval of the chief judge, in high volume court
proceedings where transcripts are requested infrequently.
- (b) in instances where a court reporter is not available.
- (c) in other instances as deemed necessary by the circuit court
judge and approved by the chief judge.
- (2) The electronic record shall be maintained in compliance with SCR
72.05, and for the length of time required in SCR 72.01 (47) for
stenographic notes or the time required for the case type in SCR Chapter
72, whichever is shorter.
- (3)(a) If a transcript of any proceeding recorded under this section
is required, the court shall order that a transcript be prepared.
- (b) The court reporter who prepares the transcript under par. (a)
shall certify that it is a verbatim transcript of the electronic
recording of the proceeding.
- (c) Transcripts under this section shall comply with the provisions
of SCR 71.04.
- (4) The director of state courts shall promulgate and publish
standards for the use of alternative means of reporting.
Respectfully submitted this 9th day of December, 1997.
J. Denis Moran, Director of State Courts
Standards for the Use of Alternative Means of Reporting
SCR 71.05(4)
1. Equipment - Minimum Standards for Recording,
Playback and Transcription; Technical and Functional Requirements.
- A. Recording
- Courtroom audio recording system equipment must include the
following minimum features:
- Clear, echo free recording
- The ability to separate and record four, independent audio sources
(i.e., judge, lawyers, witness)
- Ability to isolate each audio source for recording and/or
playback
- Four separate microphones
- Visual gain meter for each audio source
- Recording on standard size cassette, digital audio tape or other
current audio recording technology media
- Allow a minimum of six hours of continuous recording time
- Separate gain control for each channel
- If switching of tapes/cassettes is necessary, provide for automatic,
uninterrupted switching from the first cassette to the second at the end
of the tape
- If switching of tapes/cassettes is necessary, provide for an audio
and/or lighted switching signal to alert the operator of the switch
- Audio and/or lighted trouble signal to alert the operator of a
recording problem
- A counting mechanism to allow for indexing of court recordings
- B. Microphones
- Microphones with the following characteristics:
- Low profile
- Unidirectional
- Recording range of 10-12 feet
- Capable of being removed from the microphone stand and held in
hand
- Microphone stands with the following characteristics:
- Low profile
- Adequately insulated to not transmit surface noises and/or
vibrations through the microphone stand and recording
- Sufficiently sturdy to not be dislodged/moved along the surface by
anything but a deliberate attempt to move the stand
- No sharp edges
- Compatibility with the existing sound amplification system, ensuring
that the recording on each channel is free of electronic distortion,
feedback and/or other sounds that come from the sound amplification
system
- C. Playback/Transcription
- Testimony recorded during court proceedings is often transcribed.
Sound quality is a concern. Words spoken in court stand as the record of
the proceeding. The electronic recording will be used to create
transcripts of the proceeding upon request of the party. Transcripts may
be used to clarify what action was taken by the court, what action is
ordered by the court and for providing a record on appeal.
- Playback and transcription features must include:
- On/Off switch with lighted or other indicator identifying the status
of the equipment
- Four audio source independent playback capabilities
- Ability to isolate each audio source for playback
- Ability to play back all channels simultaneously
- Separate volume/gain control for each audio source
- Standard size cassette, digital audio tape or other current audio
recording media technology
- Headphones
- Counting mechanism to cue desired testimony
- Easy control of counting mechanism
- Capability of playing back the record forward and backward
- Capability of playing back the record at different speeds
- Compatibility with the existing sound amplification system, ensuring
that the playback of each audio source is free of electronic distortion,
feedback and/or other sounds that come from the sound amplification
system
- 2. Exceptions
- Section 1 lists minimum standards and covers the use of a relatively
low cost and low technology approach to electronic recording in the
courts. A system using different technical specifications may be used
if:
- it meets substantially the same or higher functional standards;
- a written proposal is submitted explaining how the functionality of
each of the requirements in Section 1 is met or exceeded;
- a showing of compliance with the requirements of SCR 72.05, as
applied to electronic recording, is made; and
- written approval is received from the director of state courts.
- The equipment standards may be revised periodically to include
additional technical approaches.
- In an emergency situation, if SCR 71.05(1)(b) applies and recording
equipment which meets the minimum standards is not available, a single,
hand-held tape recorder may be used to record a brief and/or time
critical court proceeding. In such circumstances, a transcript shall be
produced and filed no later than the third business day after the
proceeding. The recording will then be destroyed.
- 3. Operation
- The courtroom clerk, or other person designated by the judge, shall
operate the electronic recording equipment. An electronic record shall
be made of the case number and case caption. The court shall require the
parties to state and spell their names audibly into the microphone. The
clerk shall enter on the court record or minute record and a master
recording log the case number and caption, the date and type of
proceeding, the parties present and their recording channels, the
recording (e.g., tape or other storage medium such as compact disk)
number, and the starting counter number when the case is called.
- 4. Storage and Retrieval
- The clerk of court shall be the custodian of the electronic
recordings. Recordings shall be numbered with a unique number in
sequential order by calendar year (e.g., Tape #97-0001), list the
date(s) of the court activities contained on each recording, the case
type(s) and the court official conducting each proceeding. The recording
shall be stored in chronological order. The court record for the case
shall contain: a cross reference to the recording number (i.e., tape
number or compact disk number), the starting counter number and the
location where the recording is stored.
- The recording shall not be removed from its file storage location
unless an out card or receipt is left in its place indicating the person
responsible for the removal of the tape. A tape should be removed only
for duplication purposes or when it has reached the destruction date
prescribed by SCR Chapter 72.
- Storage and preservation of electronic recording media for long term
retention beyond two years must be in a secured and environmentally
controlled location following ANSI (American National Standards
Institute) standards for preservation of electronic media.
- Recordings eligible for disposal should be obliterated by physical
destruction or by erasing the data and should never be used for
recording other court activity.
- Duplicates of the electronic record may be purchased by parties to
whom a transcript would be available.
5. Transcription and Certification
- Verbatim transcripts shall be prepared upon request and shall comply
with SCR Chapter 71. A duplicate of the electronic record shall be used
for transcription purposes.
Wisconsin Lawyer