New Rules of Appellate Procedure
Marla J. Stephens
On April 30, 2001, the Wisconsin Supreme Court
entered an order amending the rules of appellate procedure upon the
petition of the Wisconsin Judicial Council.1 Beginning in 1997, the Judicial
Council's Appellate Procedure Committee solicited and reviewed
suggestions for changes to the appellate rules. After numerous drafts of
proposals were circulated among advisory committee members for comment,
the full Council unanimously approved the rule change petition that was
filed with the court in February 2000.
In an effort to make the rules easier to find and understand,
subsections and titles were created and unnecessary language was
deleted. In addition, case law affecting appellate procedure was
incorporated into the rules. Judicial Council Notes explaining the
changes are contained in the order for informational purposes. This
article will summarize the amendments to existing rules and highlight
the new rules that are effective on July 1, 2001. Changes that apply to
all appeals will be noted first, followed by changes to the rules
governing termination of parental rights appeals2 and the rules governing
criminal, civil commitment, protective placement, children's code and
juvenile justice code appeals.3 Finally, the status of several proposals in the
Judicial Council's petition that are still pending will be
discussed.
Summary of Changes to Rules 808 and 809
Time limits. Most time limits that were 7 days are
now 11 days, and most time limits that were 10 days are now 14 days.4 The new time
limits remove the impact of Wis. Stat. § 801.15(5)(a) (when
calculating time limits of less than 11 days, Saturdays, Sundays and
holidays are excluded) and assist the court in automating its
calculations of accurate deadlines.5 The time limits in Wis. Stat.
§§ 809.105 (parental consent to abortion appeal) and 809.107
(termination of parental rights appeal) have not been enlarged.
Defect in notice of appeal. An inconsequential error
in the content of the notice of appeal is not a jurisdictional defect.6 This rule
codifies existing caselaw.7
Transcript preparation time limits and requests.
Former Wis. Stat. §§ 809.11(4) and 809.16 contained the
rules governing requests for transcripts and preparation of transcripts.
Former rule 809.16 has been repealed, and its contents can now be found
in rule 809.11(4)-(7). The appellant now has 14 days (increased from 10
days) after filing the notice of appeal to request transcripts for the
other parties to the appeal and to file and serve the statement on
transcript.8
A court reporter has 5 days within which to sign and return to the
appellant a certification that the appellant has requested transcripts
for the other parties to the appeal and arranged to pay for the
copies.9
Within 14 days (increased from 10 days) of the filing of the statement
on transcript, any other party to the appeal may file and serve a
designation of additional transcripts to be included in the record on
appeal. The appellant must then file a supplemental statement on
transcript, or the other party may move the circuit court for an order
requiring the appellant to do so.10 These requirements also apply to
a cross-appellant.11 Court reporters have 60 days to file and serve
the transcripts identified in the appellant's statement on transcript
and 20 days to file and serve transcripts following a request or order
for supplementation.12 Wis. Stat. §§ 809.11(4)-(7) do
not apply in parental consent to abortion and termination of parental
rights appeals.13
Alternative dispute resolution in the court of
appeals. The court of appeals is authorized to establish an
appellate mediation program.14 Participation in the appellate mediation program
is voluntary, but participation in presubmission conferences may be
mandatory.15 Only cases in which a docketing statement is
required under Wis. Stat. § 809.10(1)(d) are eligible to
participate in the program.16 Mediation is therefore not available in appeals
brought under Wis. Stat. § 809.105 (parental consent to abortion),
§ 809.107 (termination of parental rights), § 809.32 (no merit
report), or in criminal cases. The parties to the appeal shall pay the
fees of a mediator providing services under the program, unless the fees
are waived or deferred by the court.17 The rules and procedures
governing the program shall be set forth in the court of appeals
internal operating procedures.18 Any form of alternative dispute resolution, as
defined in Wis. Stat. § 802.12(1), may be utilized.
Time limits tolled pending resolution of motions.
The following motions toll the time for performing any act under the
rules of appellate procedure from the date the motion is filed until the
date the motion is decided by an order: a motion seeking an order
affecting the disposition of an appeal or the content of a brief, a
motion seeking to supplement or correct the record on appeal, and a
motion seeking consolidation of cases.19 If a motion to supplement or
correct the record is filed in circuit court, the clerk of circuit court
may not transmit the record until the motion has been decided.20 The
motion to supplement or correct the record is deemed denied if not
decided within 14 days after it is filed.21 If a motion to supplement or
correct the record is granted, time limits continue to be tolled until
the supplemental record return is filed.22 A copy of any motion to
supplement or correct the record filed in circuit court must be served
on the clerk of the court of appeals.23 The clerk of circuit court must
be served with a copy of any motion filed under § 809.14 in the
court of appeals because the motion tolls time limits.24
Number of briefs. The number of briefs to be filed
in the supreme court remains at 22, the number of briefs to be filed in
the court of appeals remains at 10, and the number of copies of briefs
that must be served on the other parties to the appeal remains at 3.25 An
indigent party appearing without an attorney, or a prisoner appearing
without an attorney allowed to proceed without prepayment of fees under
§ 814.29(1m)(Prisoner Litigation Reform Act), must file 5 briefs in
the court of appeals and serve one copy on the other parties in a
three-judge appeal, and must file 3 briefs in the court of appeals and
serve one copy on the other parties in a one-judge appeal.26
Brief covers. Brief captions must include the names
of all parties in the circuit court and indicate the status of the party
in the circuit court and the appellate court, if any.27 For example, supreme
court briefs should state party designations from the circuit court,
court of appeals and supreme court, if applicable: Jane Doe,
Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.
Confidentiality. If a person is entitled to
confidentiality under the law, the person must be identified by first
name and last initial in all documents filed with the court.28 The
subjects of proceedings under chapters 48 (Children's Code), 51 (civil
commitment), 55 (protective placement), 938 (Juvenile Justice Code) and
in paternity cases are entitled to confidentiality. Different
confidentiality and anonymity requirements apply in parental consent to
abortion appeals.29
Signature on briefs. An attorney who files a brief
must sign it. If an attorney does not represent a party, that party must
sign the brief.30
References to parties within the brief. Parties must
be referred to by name throughout the argument section, not by their
status on appeal or their party designation.31
Reply briefs. Reply briefs must contain citations to
the record and a conclusion.32
Authorized methods of brief binding. Velobinding is
added to stapling and hot glue (or "perfect" binding) as an authorized
binding method. The clerk of court must authorize any other binding
method before the brief is filed.33
Time limits for respondent's brief and reply brief.
The respondent's brief must be filed within the later of: 30 days after
service of the appellant's brief, plus 3 days if service is by mail; or
30 days after the appellant's brief is accepted for filing by the clerk
of the court of appeals.34 The appellant's reply brief is due on the later
of: 15 days after service of the respondent's brief, plus 3 days if
service is by mail; or 15 days after the respondent's brief is accepted
for filing by the clerk.35
Briefing cross-appeals. The cross-appeal briefing
requirements have been rewritten for clarification.36
Limitation of issues in appeal of non-final order.
If a petition for leave to appeal a non-final order is granted, the
court of appeals may specify the issue or issues it will review.37
Citation of supplemental authority. If new authority
is issued after briefing or after oral argument, but before decision, a
party may notify the court by sending a letter to the clerk with a copy
to the other parties to the appeal.38 The letter must state the
citation for the new authority, identify the page of the brief or point
of oral argument to which it pertains, and briefly discuss the
proposition that the authority supports.39 If the new authority is a court
of appeals opinion, it is considered issued on the date that publication
of the opinion is ordered.40 A response letter may be sent to the clerk, with
copies to the other parties to the appeal, within 11 days after the
supplemental authority letter is served.41 The response letter must briefly
discuss why the supplemental authority does not support the stated
proposition.42
Objections to circuit court judgment or order entered after
remand. If an appellate court remands the record to the circuit
court for action upon specific issues, or for additional proceedings
while the appeal is pending, the appellate court, in the pending appeal,
may review the judgment or order that the circuit court entered
following the remand.43 A party must file in the appellate court a
written statement of objections to the circuit court judgment or order
within 14 days after the record is returned to the appellate court.44 A party
that files a written statement of objections need not file a notice of
appeal or cross-appeal.45 The obligations of a person filing a statement
of objections are the same as those of a cross-appellant.46 The
statement of objections should advise the court whether and how the
issues have changed after the remand.
Reconsideration of a court of appeals opinion or
order. A party may file a motion for reconsideration in the
court of appeals within 20 days after the date of a decision or order.47 The
motion must state with particularity the points of law or fact alleged
to be erroneously decided and must include a supporting argument.48 No
response to the motion may be filed unless ordered by the court.49 An
amended decision or order will not be issued unless the court first
orders a response.50 The motion and any response shall not exceed 5
pages in monospaced font or 1,100 words in proportional serif font.51 In
response to a motion for reconsideration, the court shall either issue
an amended decision or order, or the court shall issue an order denying
the motion.52 The court may also reconsider a decision or
order on its own motion at any time prior to remittitur if no petition
for review is filed, or within 30 days after a petition for review is
filed in the supreme court.53 No motion for reconsideration is permitted in a
§ 809.105 (parental consent to abortion) case.54 The time limit for
filing a motion for reconsideration may not be enlarged.55
Remittitur is stayed pending resolution of the motion for
reconsideration.56 Warning: the time limit for filing a petition
for review in the supreme court is not tolled by filing a motion for
reconsideration.
Petition for Review. Both the petition for review
and the response to the petition for review must have white covers.57 Ten
copies of each must be filed with the clerk of the supreme court.58
Sanctions. The court of appeals may sanction a party
who violates an order of the court.59
Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) Appeals - transcript and
circuit court case record request, transcript preparation, notice of
appeal and transmittal of record. The circuit court case record
and the transcript of the reporter's notes must be requested by a person
who files a Notice of Intent to Appeal within 15 days after filing the
Notice of Intent to Appeal.60 The transcript must be served on that person and
filed in circuit court, and the circuit court case record must be served
on that person, within 30 days after the request.61 The person must file and
serve a notice of appeal within 30 days after service of the
transcript.62 The clerk of circuit court must transmit the
record on appeal to the court of appeals within 15 days after the notice
of appeal is filed.63
TPR appeals - statement on transcript. The appellant
must request copies of the transcript for the other parties to the
appeal, and make arrangements to pay for the copies, within 5 days after
filing the notice of appeal.64 The appellant's statement on transcript,
containing the court reporter's certification that the appellant ordered
transcript copies for the other parties to the appeal and made
arrangements to pay for the copies, must be filed in the court of
appeals and served on the other parties to the appeal and the clerk of
the circuit court within 5 days after filing the notice of appeal.65 The court
reporter must serve copies of the transcript on the other parties to the
appeal within 5 days after the appellant's request.66
TPR appeals – no-merit procedure. A no-merit
report, response to no-merit report and supplemental no-merit report
under Wis. Stat. § 809.32 may be filed in a TPR appeal.67 The
no-merit time limits track the briefing time limits in Wis. Stat. §
809.107(6). The appointed attorney must file the no-merit report and
certification, and serve copies of the no-merit report, certification
and the record on appeal on the client-parent within 15 days after the
record on appeal is filed.68 The client-parent may file a response to the
no-merit report within 10 days after service of the no-merit report.69 Within 5
days after a response to the no-merit report is filed, the clerk of the
court of appeals must send a copy of the response to the appointed
attorney.70 The appointed attorney may file a supplemental
no-merit report and affidavits within 10 days after receiving the
response to the no-merit report.71
TPR appeals - ineffective assistance of counsel claims, and
other claims requiring post-judgment fact-finding. If the
appellant intends to appeal on any ground that requires fact-finding
after entry of the final judgment or order in the circuit court, the
appellant must file a motion in the court of appeals raising the issue
and asking the court to retain jurisdiction over the appeal and remand
the case to the circuit court to hear and decide the issue.72 The
motion must be filed within 15 days after the record on appeal is
filed.73
If the court of appeals grants the motion, it shall set time limits for
the circuit court to hear and decide the issue, for the appellant to
request a transcript of the remand proceedings, and for the court
reporter to file and serve the transcript of the remand proceedings, and
extend the time limit for the appellant to file a brief presenting all
grounds for relief in the pending appeal.74
Rule 809.30 appeals – time limit for state public
defender's appointment of counsel and requests for circuit court case
record and transcript. The state public defender must appoint
counsel and request a transcript of the reporter's notes and a copy of
the circuit court case record within 30 or 50 days after the state
public defender receives from the clerk of the circuit court a
file-stamped copy of the notice of intent to pursue postconviction
relief, a file-stamped copy of the judgment or order specified in the
notice of intent, a list of court reporters for the circuit court
proceedings and a list of any transcripts in the circuit court file.75 The state
public defender must appoint counsel within 30 days after receipt of the
clerk's materials if indigence does not need to be re-determined, and
within 50 days after receipt of the clerk's materials if indigence must
be determined or re-determined.76
Rule 809.30 appeals – time limit for person denied
state public defender representation to request circuit court case
record and transcript. A person who is denied representation by
the state public defender must request a transcript of the reporter's
notes, and may request a copy of the circuit court case record, within
90 days after filing the notice of intent to pursue postconviction
relief.77
Rule 809.30 appeals – service of circuit court case
record and transcript. The clerk of circuit court must serve a
copy of the circuit court case record, and the court reporter must file
and serve the transcript, within 60 days of a request to do so.78
Rule 809.30 appeals – notice of appeal. The
notice of appeal must state the last date of service of the copy of the
transcript or the circuit court case record if no postconviction motion
is filed, the date of the order determining the postconviction motion,
or the date of any other notice of appeal deadline that was set by the
court of appeals.79 A copy of the order appointing counsel must be
attached if counsel was appointed by the state public defender.80
Rule 809.30 appeals – postconviction motion. A
notice of motion should not be filed with a postconviction motion.81 A
postconviction motion is deemed denied if it is not determined by the
circuit court within 60 days after it is filed, unless the court of
appeals extends the time limit for decision at the request of the
defendant or the circuit court.82
Rule 809.30 appeals – motion to withdraw as appointed
counsel. An attorney appointed by the state public defender who
seeks to withdraw from the case must file a motion to withdraw and serve
a copy of the motion on the client and on the state public defender
appellate intake unit in the Madison appellate office.83 The motion must be filed
in the circuit court if no notice of appeal has been filed.84 If a
notice of appeal has been filed, the motion must be filed in the court
of appeals.85 Within 20 days after the motion is served, the
state public defender must determine whether successor counsel will be
appointed for the client, and notify the court of its determination.86 Before
granting the motion to withdraw, the court shall consider the state
public defender's determination and whether the client waives the right
to counsel.87 Ordinarily, a disagreement between the client
and appointed counsel about the merits of an appeal will not present
grounds for withdrawal.88 When the motion to withdraw is filed in circuit
court, the attorney must prepare and serve a copy of the order
determining the motion to withdraw upon the client and the appellate
intake unit in the Madison appellate office of the state public
defender.89 The order must be served within 14 days after
the circuit court decides the motion to withdraw.90 The withdrawal procedure
is not intended to change existing law concerning when a withdrawal
motion is required.91
Review of circuit court order determining release from
custody pending appeal. The defendant or the state may seek
review of a circuit court order concerning release on bond pending
seeking postconviction relief or pending appeal.92 The motion must be filed
within 14 days after the entry of the circuit court order.93 The party
seeking review must attach to the motion: a copy of the judgment of
conviction or other final judgment or order, a copy of the order
regarding release, the circuit court's statement of reasons for its
release decision, and the transcript of any release proceedings in the
circuit court or a statement explaining why no transcript is
available.94 The opposing party may file a response to the
motion within 14 days after the motion is filed.95
No-merit procedure – when applicable.
The no-merit procedures are required only on direct appeal.96 A
no-merit report must be filed when the client requests a no-merit report
or when the client declines to consent to have the appointed attorney
close the file without further representation by the attorney.97
No-merit procedure – notice of appeal, statement on
transcript and no-merit report. The notice of appeal must be
identified as a no-merit notice of appeal and must state the date on
which the no-merit report is due and how the date has been calculated.98 The
no-merit notice of appeal, statement on transcript and no-merit report
must be filed either 180 days after the last transcript is received,99 or 60
days after the entry of an order determining a postconviction motion.100
Copies of the transcript are not required for the other parties to the
appeal.101 Copies of the notice of appeal and statement
on transcript must be served on the state.102
No-merit procedure – copies of transcript and circuit
court case record for client. If a no-merit report is filed,
the attorney must serve copies of the transcript and the circuit court
case record on the client within 14 days after receiving a request from
the client for the copies.103 The attorney must file a statement in the
court of appeals that service of the copies has been made upon the
client.104
No-merit procedure – client counseling and notification
requirements, certification of compliance. Before filing a
no-merit report, the attorney must discuss with the client all potential
issues identified by the attorney and by the client, and the merit of an
appeal on these issues.105 The attorney must inform the client that the
client has three options: to have the attorney file a no-merit report,
to have the attorney close the file without an appeal, or to have the
attorney close the file and to proceed with an appeal without an
attorney or with another attorney retained at the client's expense.106 The
attorney must inform the client that a no-merit report will be filed if
the client requests it or if the client does not consent to have the
attorney close the file without further representation by the
attorney.107 The attorney must inform the client that, if a
no-merit report is filed, the attorney will serve a copy of the
transcripts and the circuit court case record on the client if the
client so requests.108 The attorney must inform the client that, if
the client chooses to proceed with an appeal or if the client chooses to
have the attorney close the file without an appeal, the attorney will
forward the attorney's copies of the transcripts and the circuit court
case record to the client if the client so requests.109 The attorney must
inform the client that the client may file a response to the no-merit
report, and that if the client files a response, the attorney may file a
supplemental no-merit report, and affidavit or affidavits containing
facts outside the record, possibly including confidential information,
to rebut allegations in the client's response to the no-merit report.110
Finally, the attorney must append to the no-merit report a signed
certification that the attorney has complied with these counseling and
notification requirements.111 A form for the certification is contained in
the new rule.112
No-merit procedure – response to no-merit
report. If a client files a response to the no-merit report,
the clerk of the court of appeals shall, within 5 days after the
response is filed, send a copy of the response to the attorney.113
No-merit procedure – supplemental no-merit
report. If the attorney is aware of facts outside the record
that rebut allegations in the client's response to the no-merit report,
the attorney may file a supplemental no-merit report and affidavit or
affidavits including facts outside the record.114 A supplemental
no-merit report and affidavit or affidavits must be filed and served on
the client within 30 days after the attorney receives a copy of the
client's response to the no-merit report.115 The attorney must file a
statement in the court of appeals that service has been made upon the
client.116
No-merit procedure – remand to circuit court for
fact-finding prior to decision. If the client and the attorney
allege disputed facts regarding matters outside the record, and if the
court of appeals determines that the client's version of the facts, if
true, would raise an arguably meritorious issue for appeal, the court of
appeals must remand the case to the circuit court for an evidentiary
hearing and fact-finding on the disputed facts before deciding whether
to accept or reject the no-merit report.117
Summary of pending proposals
Appeal in ch. 980 (sexually violent person commitment) and
§ 971.17 (not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect
commitment) proceedings. The Judicial Council petitioned for a
rule change allowing these appeals to proceed under the criminal
appellate rules set forth in Wis. Stat. §§ 809.30-.32, which
govern other appeals (under ch. 48, 51, 55 and 938 and in criminal
cases) in which the state public defender provides representation. The
supreme court determined that this proposal exceeds its rule making
authority, and the Judicial Council has requested legislation to enact
this proposal. The Council's request for legislation would affect
§§ 808.04(3) and (4), 809.30(1) and (2), 809.40(1) and create
§§ 971.17(7m) and 980.061. The supreme court has taken this
proposal under advisement pending legislative action.
Suppression issues in ch. 48 and 938 cases. The
Judicial Council petition requested a rule allowing suppression of
evidence issues to be raised on appeal following an admission to a
petition in a ch. 48 or 938 case. Under current law, these issues are
waived by the entry of an admission and must be preserved by taking the
case to trial. The proposal would extend the exception to the waiver
rule in criminal cases to cases under the children's and juvenile
justice code. The supreme court determined that this proposal exceeds
its rule making authority, and the Judicial Council has requested
legislation to enact it. The legislation request would create §
809.40(4). The supreme court has taken this proposal under advisement
pending legislative action.
Tolling the time limit for filing a petition for review in
the supreme court while a motion for reconsideration is pending in the
court of appeals. The Judicial Council petition proposed a rule
that would toll the time limit for filing a petition for review until
the court of appeals disposes of a timely filed motion for
reconsideration of its opinion or order. The supreme court determined
that this proposal exceeds its rule making authority, and the Judicial
Council has requested legislation to enact it. The legislation request
proposes amendments to §§ 808.10, 809.62(1) and 809.32(4) and
the creation of § 808.10(2). The supreme court has also taken this
proposal under advisement pending legislative action.
Mailbox rule – briefs deemed filed upon
mailing. The supreme court has deferred a decision on this
Judicial Council proposal until it decides State ex rel. Nichols v.
Litscher, case no. 00-0853-W (Issue: should Wisconsin adopt a
"mailbox rule" whereby a petition for review from a pro se prisoner
would be deemed filed when the petition is delivered to the prison
authorities for mailing?). The Council's petition proposed the creation
of §§ 809.80(3)(b)-(5): a brief would be timely filed if, on
or before the last day for filing, the brief was deposited in the U.S.
mail for first class delivery or more expeditious means, or if the brief
was dispatched to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery to the
clerk within 3 calendar days. An affidavit of mailing or dispatch would
be required. A brief from a person in an institution would be timely
filed if, on or before the last day for filing, it was deposited in
institution's internal mail system. An affidavit or certification of
mailing would be required. The proposed rule would not apply to
petitions for review.
Additional resources and acknowledgements.
Additional materials and information about the revisions to the
appellate rules can be found at the State Bar of Wisconsin's Appellate Practice
Section web site
The Judicial Council Appellate
Procedure Committee members included the Hon. Ted E. Wedemeyer, Jr.,
Presiding Judge, Court of Appeals, District I, co-chair; Marla J.
Stephens, Director, Wisconsin Public Defender Appellate Division,
co-chair; Mary E. Burke, Director, Wisconsin Department of Justice
Criminal Appeals Unit; and Margaret Carlson, Chief Staff Attorney, Court
of Appeals. Advisory committee members, who drafted, reviewed or
suggested changes in the rules, were: Shelley A. Grogan, Judicial Clerk
to Judge Wedemeyer; Hon. Daniel P. Anderson, Judge, District II Court of
Appeals; Marilyn L. Graves, Clerk of Supreme Court and Court of Appeals;
Cornelia G. Clark, Clerk of Supreme Court and Court of Appeals; Joseph
M. Wilson, Supreme Court Commissioner; Matthew J. Frank, Administrator,
Wisconsin Department of Justice Legal Services Division; Kenneth Lund,
Deputy First Assistant, Wisconsin Public Defender Appellate Division;
Keith A. Findley, University of Wisconsin Law School; Robert R. Henak,
Henak Law Offices, S.C., for the Wisconsin Association of Criminal
Defense Lawyers; Patrick K. Stevens, Wisconsin Manufacturers &
Commerce; Lynn R. Laufenberg, Laufenberg Law Offices; Charles H. Barr,
Croen & Barr, for Milwaukee Bar Association Bench & Bar Court of
Appeals Committee; Thomas McAdams, Assistant District Attorney for
Milwaukee County, for Wisconsin District Attorney's Association; Robert
D. Donohoo, Deputy District Attorney for Milwaukee County; Werner E.
Scherr, Kasdorf, Lewis & Sweitlik, S.C.; Thomas M. Olson, S.C., The
Law Center; Elizabeth Ewald Herrick, Attorney at Law; and Donald L.
Romundson, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., for the Appellate Practice Section,
State Bar of Wisconsin. The Judicial Council gratefully acknowledges
their contributions.
Endnotes
1 Order No.
00-02, 2001 WI 39.
3 Wis. Stat.
§§ 809.30-.32.
4 Wis. Stat.
§§ 808.07(6)(motion objecting to sufficiency of surety for
undertaking costs due 14 days after service of copy of undertaking),
809.11(4) and (5)(appellant's request for copies of transcript for other
parties to appeal and statement on transcript due 14 days after filing
notice of appeal), 809.13(party's response to petition for leave to
intervene in appeal due 11 days after service of petition), 809.14(1)
and (2)(response to motion seeking an order or other relief due 11 days
after service of motion, and motion for reconsideration of procedural
order due 11 days after service of order), 809.19(7)(c)(non-party motion
requesting permission to file brief due 14 days after filing of
respondent's brief), 809.25(1)(c)(motion objecting to statement of costs
due 11 days after service of statement), 809.32(4)(response to no-merit
petition for review due 14 days after service of supplemental petition),
809.41(1) and (4)(respondents motion for three-judge panel due 14 days
after service of notice of appeal or with the response to a petition for
leave to appeal a non-final order, attorney general may file response to
motion for three-judge panel within 11 days after service in any case in
which the state is a party, respondents motion for hearing in county of
origin due 14 days after service of notice of appeal), 809.50(1) and
(2)(petition for leave to appeal non-final judgment or order due 14 days
after entry of judgment or order, opposing party's response to petition
due within 14 days after service of petition), 809.51(2)(response to
request for court to exercise supervisory jurisdiction or original
jurisdiction to issue a prerogative writ), 809.60(1) and (2)(petition to
bypass court of appeals and response to same), 809.62(3)(response to
petition for review), 809.70(2)(response to petition requesting that
supreme court take jurisdiction over original action due 14 days after
service of court order to file response).
5 Wisconsin
Judicial Council Note, 2001 following Wis. Stat. §§
808.07(6).
6 Wis. Stat.
§ 809.10(1)(f).
7
Northridge Bank v. Community Eye Care Ctr., 94 Wis. 2d 201,
203, 287 N.W.2d 810, 811 (1980) and Carrington v. St. Paul Fire
& Marine Ins. Co., 169 Wis. 2d 211, 217 n.2, 485 N.W.2d 267,
269 n.2 (1992).
8 Wis. Stat.
§ 809.11(4)(a) and (b).
9 Wis. Stat.
§ 809.11(7)(b).
10 Wis.
Stat. § 809.11(5).
11 Wis.
Stat. § 809.11(6).
12 Wis.
Stat. § 809.11(7)(a).
13 Wis.
Stat. §§ 809.105 and 809.107.
14 Wis.
Stat. § 809.17(2m).
19 Wis.
Stat. § 809.14(3)(a) and (b).
20 Wis.
Stat. § 809.15(4)(c).
22 Wis.
Stat. § 809.14(3)(b).
23 Wis.
Stat. § 809.15(4)(c).
24 Wis.
Stat. §§ 809.14(3)(c) and 809.82(2)(d).
25 Wis.
Stat. § 809.19(8)(a)1. and 2.
26 Wis.
Stat. §§ 809.19(8)(a)3 and 809.43(2).
27 Wis.
Stat § 809.19(9).
28 Wis.
Stat § 809.81(8).
29 Wis.
Stat § 809.105(12).
30 Wis.
Stat § 809.19(1)(h).
31 Wis.
Stat § 809.19(1)(i).
32 Wis.
Stat § 809.19(4).
33 Wis.
Stat. § 809.19(8)(b)4.
34 Wis.
Stat § 809.19(3)(a).
35 Wis.
Stat § 809.19(4)(a).
36 Wis.
Stat. § 809.19(6).
37 Wis.
Stat. § 809.50(3).
38 Wis.
Stat. § 809.19(10).
41 Wis.
Stat. § 809.19(11).
43 Wis.
Stat. § 808.075(8).
46
See Judicial Council Note, 2001 to Wis. Stat. §
808.075.
47 Wis.
Stat. § 809.24(1).
52 Wis.
Stat. § 809.24(2).
53 Wis.
Stat. § 809.24(3).
54 Wis.
Stat. § 809.24(4).
55 Wis.
Stat. § 809.82(2)(e).
56 Wis.
Stat. § 809.26(1).
57 Wis.
Stat. § 809.62(4).
59 Wis.
Stat. § 809.83(2).
60 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(4).
62 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(5)(a).
63 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(5)(b).
64 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(5)(c).
65 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(5)(d).
66 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(5)(e).
67 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(5m).
72 Wis.
Stat. § 809.107(6)(am).
75 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(3)(e).
77 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(3)(f).
78 Wis.
Stat. §§ 809.30(2)(g) and 967.06.
79 Wis.
Stat. § 809.10(1)(b)5.
80 Wis.
Stat. § 809.10(1)(b)6.
81 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(2)(h).
82 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(2)(i).
83 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(4)(a).
86 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(4)(b).
87 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(4)(c).
88
See Judicial Council Note, 2001 following Wis. Stat. §
809.30(4):
Judicial Council Note, 2001:
...
Subsection (4) establishes a procedure for making
and determining motions to withdraw by appointed counsel. This
rule does not change existing law concerning when a withdrawal motion is
necessary. See e.g. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183
Wis. 2d 587, 622-24, 516 N.W.2d 362 (1994).
Often motions to withdraw are the result of a
disagreement between appointed counsel and the defendant, sometimes
inaccurately called a "conflict," about the existence of a meritorious
issue for appeal, or about the manner in which any such issue should be
raised. It is counsel's duty to decide what issues in a case have
merit for an appeal. Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745
(1983). Postconviction counsel is entitled to exercise reasonable
professional judgment in winnowing out even arguable issues in favor of
others perceived to be stronger. Id. Counsel's
failure to raise an issue on direct appeal may prevent the defendant
from raising it in a subsequent s. 974.06 collateral review proceeding,
absent "sufficient reason." State v. Escalona-Naranjo,
185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994).
The rules of appellate procedure require that a
defendant choose whether to proceed with the assistance of appointed
counsel or proceed pro se. State v. Redmond, 203 Wis. 2d
13, 552 N.W.2d 115 (Ct. App. 1996). A defendant has neither the
right to appointed counsel of choice nor the right to insist that a
particular issue be raised. Oimen v. McCaughtry, 130 F.2d
809 (7th Cir. 1997). "The defendant may terminate appellate
counsel's representation and proceed pro se or the defendant
may allow postconviction relief to continue based on counsel's brief and
then seek relief on the grounds of ineffective assistance of appellate
counsel." State v. Debra A.E., 188 Wis. 2d 111, 137-39,
523 N.W.2d 727 (1994). On ineffective assistance of appellate
counsel claims, the court will determine whether counsel's choice of
issues met the objective standard of reasonableness. Gray v.
Greer, 778 F.2d 350 (7th Cir. 1985).
The state public defender will not appoint
successor counsel where a defendant disagrees with the legal conclusions
of appointed counsel or when a defendant wants a second opinion as to
the merits of an appeal. To do so would unduly delay the
disposition of the appeal, and would be contrary to the interests of
justice. Wis. Admin. Code § PD 2.04.
If a defendant elects to waive counsel and
proceed pro se, the court must find that the defendant has been
provided with clear warnings with respect to forfeiture of the right to
counsel and the dangers of self-representation. State v.
Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d 721, 546 N.W.2d 406 (1996).
89 Wis.
Stat. § 809.30(4)(d).
91
See Judicial Council Note, 2001 following Wis. Stat. §
809.30(4) and State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587,
622-24, 516 N.W.2d 362 (1994).
92 Wis.
Stat. § 809.31(5).
96 Wis.
Stat. § 809.32(1)(a).
98 Wis.
Stat. § 809.32(2).
99 Wis.
Stat. § 809.32(2)(a).
100
Wis. Stat. § 809.32(2)(b).
101
Wis. Stat. § 809.32(2).
103
Wis. Stat. § 809.32(1)(d).
105
Wis. Stat. § 809.32(1)(b)1.
107
Wis. Stat. § 809.32(1)(b)2.
110
Ibid. Also see Judicial Council Note, 2001 following Wis. Stat.
§ 809.32:
Judicial Council Note, 2001:
...
Subsection (1) (f) was created to allow the attorney to reply to
the defendant's response to a no-merit report. The rule allows the
attorney to file a supplemental no-merit report and affidavit(s)
disclo
Wisconsin Lawyer