Sign In
    Wisconsin Lawyer
    November 01, 1999

    Wisconsin Lawyer November 1999: Supreme Court Digest

    Supreme Court Digest


    By Prof. Daniel D. Blinka & Prof. Thomas J. Hammer


    Constitutional Law

    Elections - Free Speech - Express Advocacy

    Elections Board of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, No. 98-0596 (filed 7 July 1999)

    The Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce Issues Mobilization Council Inc. (IMC) produced advertisements directed at six incumbent state legislators in the Fall 1996 general election. The legislators complained to the state elections board, which later determined that the IMC had engaged in express advocacy and ordered it to comply with chapter 11 of the Wisconsin Statutes by April 1997 (for example, the filing of a campaign finance report). IMC refused to comply and the elections board filed this action against IMC and others in June 1997. The circuit court granted the respondents' motion to dismiss the complaint on constitutional grounds.

    On bypass from the court of appeals, the supreme court affirmed in an opinion written by Justice Crooks. The court held that when IMC and the other defendants broadcast their advertisements, they "lacked fair warning that the ads could qualify as express advocacy in Wisconsin under a context-based approach." For this reason, the board "engaged in retroactive rule-making in attempting to apply such an approach." Based on this holding, the supreme court declined to address whether the ads in fact were express advocacy. Nevertheless, the court "determine[d] that the definition of the term express advocacy is not limited to the specific list of 'magic words' such as 'vote for' or 'defeat' found in" the case law. The court left the "task" of fashioning a rule governing express advocacy advertisements to the Legislature or the elections board, "consistent with this opinion."

    Justice Wilcox did not participate. Justice Bablitch concurred. Justice Prosser, joined by Chief Justice Abrahamson, concurred in part and dissented in part, noting that "[t]he First Amendment is not what it used to be."

    Prof. Daniel D. Blinka and Prof. Thomas J. Hammer invite comments and questions about the digests. They can be reached at the Marquette University Law School, 1103 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53233, (414) 288-7090.


Join the conversation! Log in to comment.

News & Pubs Search

-
Format: MM/DD/YYYY