|
|
Vol. 73, No. 3, March 2000 |
Return
to article
Sample Daubert Expert Deposition (product liability)
I. Background Information
A. Review of witness's curriculum vitae (CV)
B. Review of witness's qualifications as identified on
plaintiffs' answers to written interrogatories
C. Questions relating to formal education and degrees
D. Personal data
E. Professional associations and committees
F. Publication of articles
G. Seminars, speeches, and so on
II. Employment
A. Present employment
- Type of business (for example, corporation, sole proprietorship,
and so on). Does expert work out of a "home office?"
- Number of professional employees
- Advertisements
- Speeches, presentations, and so on, for attorneys
- Amount of business with:
a. plaintiff's law firm
b. other plaintiff law firms
c. defense attorneys or insurance companies
- Identify and list cases and type of products with each item
identified in item 5
a. list of cases and products involved
- Percent of income from outside consulting work for each of
the groups identified in number 5
B. Prior employment or consulting work
- Obtain details of all prior positions, type of work performed,
name of supervisors, and so on
III. Other Types of Cases Involving Product in Question
A. For each case, obtain the name of the case caption, name
of attorneys involved, where the lawsuit was pending, the alleged
defect, the current status of the case, and whether the witness's
deposition or trial testimony has been given
IV. Background and Experience with Type of Product Involved
A. Design
- Details of design and release responsibility and experience
- Details of actual work performed
- Name and address of supervisor for each position
B. Operation or use of product
C. Testing of product
D. Research and evaluation of articles concerning product
E. Knowledge concerning manufacturers, designers of competitive
products
F. Preparation and publication of any articles, speeches,
or similar presentations involving similar products
G. Any other consultations or evaluations concerning similar
products
H. Identify source of expert's knowledge about product
involved
V. Knowledge and Application of Existing Standards and Guidelines
A. Applicable government standards and regulations
B. Industry standards and guidelines
C. Industry custom and practices
D. Similar products of competitors
E. Expert's involvement with any of the various organizations
or committees
F. Expert's involvement or communication with any representatives
of defendant
G. Expert's involvement and/or knowledge of persons involved
on critical committees or with competitor's products
VI. Is Investigation and Analysis of Experts Complete?
A. Are there any other tests or calculations that the expert
recommends?
B. Are there any additional facts or data that are necessary
before the expert can provide a final opinion?
C. Are the opinions and conclusions of the expert final?
VII. General Reference Materials and Articles Recognized
by Expert as Authoritative
A. Mark and identify exhibits that plaintiffs' expert
will recognize and accept
VIII. Retention in Present Case
A. Compliance with subpoena or notice to produce items requested
B. Examination and review of complete files and records and
other information contained in file. What information has been
removed? Identify and obtain information on any materials claimed
to be privileged.
C. Record keeping system and procedures used by expert
D. Purpose of retention
E. Services performed
- Research or reference materials reviewed by expert
- Inspection of product/exemplars
- Testing conclusions
- Review all allegedly nonprivileged notes, memos, correspondence,
telephone conferences, and so on, of expert
- Review all materials relating to expert's analysis,
evaluation, and computations
- Analysis, evaluation, and computation
F. Amount of time spent on case to date
- Examination of time records
- Evaluation of each category of work performed and amount
of time spent
G. Identify expert's rates and charges to date
- Standard fee
a. Deposit
b. Other
IX. Summary of Expert's Understanding as to How Accident
or Incident Occurred
A. Identify all facts and data relied upon by expert and sources
thereof
B. Assumptions
C. Fair and objective consideration given by expert to all
factors that the expert has considered important
D. Conclusions and opinions as to how or why accident occurred
X. Questions Relating to the Methodology and Reasoning Process
Used by Witness In Reaching His or Her Opinions and Conclusions
A. General questions relating to expert's general beliefs,
philosophy, and opinions
B. Assumptions
C. Fair and objective consideration given by expert to all
factors that the expert has considered important
D. Conclusions and opinions as to how or why accident occurred
XI. Questions Relating to the Methodology and Reasoning Process
Used by Witness in Reaching His or Her Opinions and Conclusions
A. General questions relating to expert's general beliefs,
philosophy, and opinions
B. Questions relating to expert's acceptance of general
principles relied upon by the defense
C. General acceptance as authoritative or reliable, the articles
and other written documents or publications relied upon by the
defense
XII. Expert's Opinions on Available Defense
A. Did your analysis include evaluation of the plaintiffs'
conduct?
- If so, what are your opinions and conclusions?
- What facts and data did you rely upon?
- Did the plaintiffs' conduct violate any:
a. government standard or regulation
b. industry guidelines
c. industry custom or practice or
d. employment procedures
|