In Plain English
Finding the perfect tense
Different verb tenses can be coordinated in one passage
to express actions that happen at different times, that happen
because of each other, or that happen only in the context of
another action.
By Mary Barnard Ray
Many writers have been taught that they must choose one verb
tense and use it exclusively throughout a paragraph, a passage,
or even a whole document. This rule, followed literally, hamstrings
the temporal logic of a document, driving verbs to shed nuances
of meaning as they conform to a common time frame. The text is
reduced to a string of actions listed with logical indifference
toward their interaction. In truth, almost any document needs
to express actions that happen at different times, that happen
because of each other, or that happen only in the context of
another action. Different tenses are needed to express these
truths. Indeed, this is why verb tenses exist.
English grammar employs a collection of tenses that, when
used with various helping verbs, make English verbs communicate
the relationship between events.
Example: The patient underwent (simple past)
outpatient surgery for a drooping eyelid on March 15, 1997.
During the surgery, the anesthesia was administered (past,
passive voice) through a vaporizing machine that generally
calibrates (present) the proper dosage to deliver
(infinitive) throughout the surgery... . As a result, the
patient now suffers (present) severe brain damage
and will be incapacitated (future perfect) for the rest
of his life.
The interrelated tenses in this example signal the relationship
of events. Thus, a writer who masters the logic of verb tenses
is able to communicate a sequence of events precisely, and can
even suggest causality by the proper marriage of different tenses.
Although a writer need not be monogamous about verb tense,
that writer does need to avoid profligate meanderings and mismatches.
He or she must use each tense properly and keep the interrelationship
of the tenses logical. Doing this requires a clear understanding
of the meaning of each verb tense. After seeing the various possible
tenses, a writer usually has little trouble choosing the tense
that best communicates his or her meaning.
The present tenses
There are three basic present tenses: simple present, present
progressive (some sources call this the progressive form or progressive
aspect, rather than a tense), and present perfect. The simple
present tense is the proper choice for current actions, but it
is also the choice to communicate habitual, repeated actions
that still occur.
Example: I review each of the contracts drafted
by our firm.
Under this reasoning, statutory language is properly stated
in present tense, because it speaks to repeated actions that
still occur. (This communication of continuous repetition can
be called the iterative aspect of a verb, if you want to impress
or annoy someone with an obscure grammar term.)
Habitual actions often need to be expressed in the same sentence
with other actions.
Example: Joe Smith has asked (present perfect)
me to contact you about this project because I review
(present) each of the contracts drafted by our firm.
The present progressive tense is the proper choice when the
action is in progress, but not habitual. Choosing this tense
communicates to the reader that this action is not to be viewed
as happening at one point in time, but rather is occurring over
a period of time stretching into the present.
Example: I am reviewing (present progressive)
this contract further because international contracts involve
(present) many special concerns.
The present progressive can be used in a routine statement
of fact, as in the previous example, or it can be used to suggest
a writer's larger meaning.
Example: The demographics of the baby boomers have
(present) and are still having (present progressive)
an effect on the economy.
The present perfect tense expresses actions completed just
before a present action. Thus, it has a natural aptitude for
combining with other tenses. The present perfect tense allows
the writer to express an action that sets the stage for a current
action. It can suggest the reasoning behind a present action.
Example: I have reviewed (present perfect) this
contract and suggest (present) that you request
(present) a few modifications before signing.
The present perfect also can be used to suggest a sense of
completion, or finality.
Example: I have reviewed (present perfect) this
contract at great length.
Accurate coordination of these present tenses adds clarity
by coordinating the sequence and relationship of various actions.
For example, the first version of the following passage uses
the present perfect tense throughout. This unchanging tense
is difficult to understand because it hides the cause and effect
relationships among the various verbs. In contrast, the second
version coordinates the tenses to reflect those relationships.
Version 1: I have reviewed many contracts for
all our firm's attorneys. So your attorney asked me to study
the enclosed contract for you. I have completed this review
and have written this memo to suggest that you request
the following modifications before signing.
Version 2: Because I review contracts for all
of our firm's attorneys, your attorney asked me to study
the enclosed contract for you. Now that I have completed
this review, I am writing to suggest that you request
the following modifications before signing.
The past tenses
The three past tenses, congruent with the three present tenses,
are simple past, past progressive, and past perfect. Use the
simple past tense for actions completed before the time of the
writing.
Example: The court resolved this question in
Hendricks v. Joplin.
The simple past tense tells the reader to think of the action
as one single event, rather than a process happening over
a period of time. It sounds simple and straightforward;
it often enhances a confident tone and improves readability.
Nevertheless, the other past tenses have their uses. The past
progressive tense is the proper choice for expressing an action
that you want to present as occurring over a period of time.
Example: The courts were discussing this question
in cases from the 1930s to the present.
The past progressive tense is frequently needed to coordinate
two actions from the past when one (stated in the simple past)
occurred in the context of the other action (stated in the past
progressive).
Example: Although the courts were discussing
this question in cases from the 1930s on, the issue remained
unresolved until Hendricks v. Joplin.
When, however, one past action led to another, rather than
providing the background context, then the best choice for expressing
that past action is the past perfect tense. The past perfect
tense indicates that this action was completed before some other
past action.
Example: Since the courts had addressed the
issue in Hendricks, they were unwilling to allow Wilson
v. Lewis to resurrect the issue the following year.
Coordination of these three past tenses, in summary, allows
you to communicate the significance of each action more precisely,
composing a unified story rather than merely listing information.
The future tenses
The future tenses are not needed as frequently in legal writing
as the past tenses. When used carefully, though, they convey
some interesting subtexts. For example, the simple future tense
is the best choice when promising that something will indeed
happen.
Mary Barnard Ray is a legal
writing lecturer and director of the Legal Writing Individualized
Instruction Services at the U.W. Law School. She has taught writing
workshops and offered individual sessions for law students; she
also taught advanced writing and commenting and conferencing
techniques in the training course for the legal writing teaching
assistants. She has taught and spoken nationally at many seminars
and conferences of legal and college writing instructors. Her
publications include two coauthored legal writing books, Getting
It Right and Getting It Written and Beyond the Basics,
published by West Publishing Co.
If you have a writing problem that you can't
resolve, email or send
your question to Ms. Ray, c/o Wisconsin Lawyer, State Bar of
Wisconsin, P.O. Box 7158, Madison, WI 53707-7158. Your question
and Ms. Ray's response will be published in this column.
Readers who object to their names being mentioned should state
so in their letters. |
Example: I will send you a copy of the will
for final review tomorrow.
(Some sources label this an aspect, rather than a tense, because
the auxiliary word, will, creates the time change, rather than
a change in the base verb itself, send.) In contrast, the conditional
form of the verb suggests something may not happen.
Example: I would choose a less drastic action.
Often the simple future must be used with another tense so
the writer can express the sequence of various action.
Example: When these revisions are complete (present),
I will send (future) you a copy of the will for final
review.
Like the other progressive tenses, the future progressive
communicates that an action will continue over time. This can
suggest a pessimism about results, or a need for patience.
Example: The corporation's attorneys will be
arguing (future progressive) this issue for many years to
come.
Often the future progressive is needed to coordinate two different
future actions in one sentence.
Example: This action will be pending (future
progressive) for many years before the issue is resolved
(present perfect/passive voice).
Finally, the future perfect tense communicates that the action
will be completed by the time another event or action occurs.
Example: The negotiators will have met several
times before the press conference.
Example: The company will have bound itself
legally by accepting the offer.
Summary
One of the great riches of the English language is the variety
of its verb forms. Although using the nine verb tenses is not
the end to mastering English verb forms, it is a solid, essential
beginning. Realizing that different tenses can be coordinated
in one passage, a writer is freed to make that choice with grace
and clarity. This freedom, in turn, prepares the writer to choose
among the other forms of verbs that are not tenses.
|