Civil strategies for handling embezzlement cases encompass many issues and complications different from those involving proof of the act. This primer offers strategies for issues affecting the employer, the embezzler, and the embezzler's spouse.

Noncompete agreements expressly limit their reach to a particular geographic territory. In contrast, nonsolicitation agreements operationally limit their geographic scope by restricting competitive activities to certain customers of the employer. Wisconsin courts in Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin v. Wysocki and Equity Enterprises Inc. v. Milosch have struggled with the geographic scope of nonsolicitation agreements, thus complicating the task of drafting enforceable restrictive covenant