Wisconsin Lawyer
Vol.
79, No. 9, September 2006
Letters
Letters to the
editor: The Wisconsin Lawyer publishes as many letters in each
issue as space permits. Please limit letters to 500 words; letters may
be edited for length and clarity. Letters should address the issues, and
not be a personal attack on others. Letters endorsing political
candidates cannot be accepted. Please mail letters to "Letters to the
Editor," Wisconsin Lawyer, P.O. Box 7158, Madison, WI 53707-7158, fax
them to (608) 257-4343, or email them.
Honoring James H. Schlender Sr.
The State Bar of Wisconsin lost an outstanding member when James H.
Schlender Sr. passed away in 2005. Schlender and I
were U.W. Law School classmates and friends. He was the very first
recipient of the Wisconsin Law Foundation Belle Case
LaFollette Award. The Wisconsin Legislature passed Senate Joint
Resolution 74 in his honor in 2005. He was a member of the Lynx clan
of the Lac Courte Oreilles band of the Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
and had been a tribal attorney. He served on the State
Bar Indian Law Section board and on the law school's "Friends of
L.E.O." Scholarship Fund Steering Committee.
For 20 years Schlender also served as the chief executive officer of
the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife
Commission (GLIFWC). Some will recall the late 1980s Chippewa
spearfishing controversy that involved significant federal Indian law
litigation. The GLIFWC, which grew out of the litigation, is an agency
"committed to the implementation of off-reservation treaty rights
on behalf of 11 member Ojibwe tribes." As CEO, Schlender
implemented spearing seasons, drafted tribal code, interpreted case
law, negotiated with governmental agencies, and worked in Washington,
D.C., on resource appropriation legislation.
When I was working for the Wisconsin Supreme Court I realized that
the spearfishing controversy was drawing
national attention to Indian law, a subject that was unfamiliar to
most Wisconsin attorneys. As a member of the Committee for
Participation of Women in the Law, I recommended and cochaired a
mid-year convention CLE program on Indian law. This successful
program became the catalyst for creating the Indian Law Section. I
also was on the Board of Governors and felt this section was
necessary because Wisconsin has 11 federally recognized tribes.
Schlender and I shared a mutual respect for our respective roles
that grew out of the Chippewa spearfishing controversy. I
last saw Jim at the 2005 Bench Bar Convention when I looked in on the
Indian Law Section CLE program. Jim mentioned that it
was too bad younger and newer attorneys did not know the history of
the Indian Law Section. His comment stayed with me as
I attended the Professional Ethics Committee and Nonresident Lawyers
Division board CLE program. I went back and told Jim
that I could share that history after their program break. He
introduced me. In sharing the history, I emphasized that attendees
could research federal court decisions, media coverage, and State Bar
records.
This year's Annual Convention was different without Jim but I know
he would have greeted me with his warm smile and
big hug. We would have liked that Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson was
a presenter at the 2006 Indian Law Section CLE
program. And, we would have recalled that the Chief Justice also was
one of the many who attended that first CLE program on Indian
law. Shakespeare said, "I am wealthy in my
friends." And, so it is for me. James H. Schlender Sr. was a fine
lawyer, administrator,
and State Bar member who also was a gem of a friend.
Donna M. Jones
President-elect, Nonresident Lawyers Division
Austell, Ga.
Expand Diploma Privilege
Steve Levine's idea of expanding the diploma privilege to any
graduate of, presumably, an ABA-accredited law school is an idea whose
time should come. (See Dianne Molvig, Open to Debate,
79 Wis. Law. 6 (July 2006).) The bar exam is nothing but a hoop to jump
through for anyone able to successfully pursue a course at an accredited
law school. An enormous amount of money is spent on bar review courses,
which basically do nothing but train a person on how to take an exam.
Far better to use those resources in practical, hands-on training for
how to be a lawyer. A mentorship program, practice courses in law
school, and perhaps seminars on the peculiarity of Wisconsin law for
out-of-state graduates, would better assure the public of competent
representation.
David L. Walther
Santa Fe, N.M.
Wisconsin Lawyer