Wisconsin
Lawyer
Vol. 81, No. 2, February
2008
Inside the Bar
Committee Dissolution
When a committee no longer serves its intended purpose, it can be
dissolved, and that's what happened to the Group and Prepaid Legal
Services Committee.
by
George C. Brown,
State Bar executive director
At the December 2007 meeting of the State Bar Board of Governors,
an action took place that almost never happens in an association. A
long-standing committee of the State
Bar requested approval from the Board to be disbanded. It did so because
it
realized that it no longer performed a function useful to Wisconsin
lawyers or the
public.
Back in the 1970s, a method of providing access to legal
services spread
from Europe to the United States and Wisconsin - group and prepaid legal
services plans. These plans emerged largely as an employee benefit in
unionized
workplaces, such as automobile factories. Because there was a concern
that some
of these new plans might not be well run, the Wisconsin Supreme Court
granted
the State Bar's request to require that these plans be nonprofit, that
they be
registered with the State Bar, and that lawyers report annually to the
Bar on
their work for such plans. At that time, most plans in this state were
being set
up and run by Wisconsin lawyers. The Group and Prepaid Legal Services
Committee
was formed to review these annual filings to ensure that the lawyers
registered
with the plan were properly licensed and that the plan providers were
operating
within the law.
As time passed, enthusiasm for these plans waned and although
the
committee continued to operate, its work became something of a routine
task. In the
early 1990s, Congress removed the pretax benefit that previously had
been granted
to such plans, and enthusiasm for the plans waned even further. And then
came
the Internet.
The development and expansion of the Internet created the
opportunity for
new business models and eliminated many companies that used traditional
methods
to provide information. Group and prepaid legal service plans were among
the
businesses that underwent significant change. Many of the plans
available to
the public were no longer just available through the workplace. The
Internet
and direct marketing provided inexpensive ways for plans to sign up new
members. For-profit plans began to be available both to lawyers as
providers and to
the public as potential clients. Many of these plans were headquartered
outside Wisconsin and were not aware of the old nonprofit and
registration
requirements. Wisconsin lawyers who served as providers to these plans
were unwittingly
violating the rules simply by being a provider. Concurrently, over these
same years, Wisconsin's consumer protection laws and their enforcement
through
both the Department of Justice and the Department of Agriculture, Trade,
and
Consumer Protection were steadily improving.
As it became increasingly aware of these various developments,
the
State Bar's Group and Prepaid Legal Services Committee struggled with
how to
respond. Should it more proactively try to enforce rules that gave it no
enforcement authority, actively search out these providers and educate
them, or should
it seek a change in the rules to accommodate the new reality of how
lawyers
and plans were operating? Finally, about a year ago, the committee
stepped back
from the details, looked at the situation from afar, reviewed the
current
consumer protection laws, and concluded that supreme
court rules governing the plans were now antiquated, that there were
sufficient consumer protection laws in place
to protect the public, and that the rules and the work of the committee
were
no longer needed, were redundant, and were an unnecessary burden to
lawyers and
the plan providers while delivering no additional benefit to the
consumer.
Upon review, the Board of Governors agreed with the committee's
assessment, as
did the supreme court, and the rules were modified to eliminate the
registration
and reporting requirements. The committee no longer had a purpose, and,
instead
of searching for a mission where there was none, the members asked the
Board
of Governors to dissolve the committee. The Board unanimously agreed,
and
the committee ceased to exist.
Wisconsin
Lawyer